The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge. ℯxplicit 00:40, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:keep. ℯxplicit 00:40, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Given the scope of Tolkien's work, categories like this are useful. Yes, it's unique... for now, but I can imagine something similar developing for the Song of Fire and Ice realms, too, and it bears comparison with Category:The Chronicles of Narnia countries. Grutness...wha? 00:18, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Category:Middle-earth. Most of the contents here are redirects, not articles, so having this category is just not justified.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:34, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- There is likely to be enough content to split this fictional universe. Peterkingiron (talk) 11:53, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
