Talk:Boeing 737 MAX

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Boeing 737 MAX article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 150 days

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Aviation: Aircraft C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

United States C‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Boeing 737 MAX appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 September 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the smallest member of the Boeing 737 Next Generation family will not be continued in the family's replacement, the Boeing 737 MAX?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Boeing 737 MAX.

Wikipedia

Text and/or other creative content from Boeing 737 MAX was copied or moved into List of Boeing 737 MAX orders with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Boeing 737 MAX was copied or moved into Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Discussions:

RM, Boeing 737 MAX → Boeing 737 Max, No consensus, 11 March 2019, discussion
RM, Boeing 737 MAX → Boeing 737 Max, No consensus, 25 May 2019, discussion
MRV, Boeing 737 MAX → Boeing 737 Max, Endorse closure as no consensus, 1 June 2019, discussion

Orders and deliveries.

The template need updated as it is used on a couple articles. I’m lost on how the current numbers fit with the data on Boeing’s website. Also, the link that is attached to the template needs updated as Boeing has changed their website. Before I go messing with it, would someone else that has worked on the numbers before like to take a shot at it? Like I said, the math does not add up to me give the data on their site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlackBird1008 (talk • contribs) 16:45, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done 87.200.56.102 (talk) 13:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

2021-11-05 MAX 8200 011 - Copy.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:52, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Images

most images in this page is not showing the correct engines Leap 1B, which is deformed at the bottom 42.188.174.66 (talk) 42.188.174.66 (talk) 15:15, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Um, no, they're all correct. It's the -700/-800/-900 series nacelles that have the pronounced cheeks for the engine accessories, the MAX nacelles are more rounded. Acroterion (talk) 15:33, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Crash, not accident

I'm tired of using the word "accident" regarding transportation system fatalities. It's a loaded, political word used to dismiss deaths and injury as unavoidable and/or unpredictable. We need to stop using the word "accident" throughout Wikipedia regarding transportation deaths. It's already being phased out in news publishing best practices.

It's extremely frustrating that this is still being debated.