Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Tycoon 2
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:22, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- Air Tycoon 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The video game fails WP:GNG -- no multiple, reliable, independent, in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. No meaningful hits in reliable source search [1] and regular searching reveals only short and unreliable reviews (e.g. [2][3][4] (AppSpy is under review on WT:VG/RS, but it would still be the only one)). — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 00:22, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:47, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:47, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. I'd redirect to the dev or series article, but none exists. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ping}} me. czar 00:32, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Clearly not yet notable and acceptable at all. Draft and userfy later if needed at best, SwisterTwister talk 06:15, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Hate to "per nom", but per nom. Can't find any reliable sources. -- ferret (talk) 22:22, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.