Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oray Thaai Oray Kulam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete After two relistings, it's time to close this, as no one's recommending keeping the article. If someone can come up with reliable sources, I'd consider reinstating the article. Deor (talk) 15:43, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oray Thaai Oray Kulam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is another Rajeshbieee related article. The article has the same sourcing issues as the other films, in that the sourcing in the article is very poor and based on e-commerce sites, which aren't usable in any fashion. I'd originally PRODed it, but it was one of several bulk dePRODs with the rationale that it should go to AfD. This was created prior to Gantlet's block, so this can't be deleted via G5.

A search for sourcing using the India WP's search engine brings up little to nothing, as does a Google search. Foreign language sources may exist, but I'm unable to find those due to a language barrier. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:31, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 11:01, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 11:01, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (negotiate) 20:19, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:18, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as per Tokyogirl79's rationale. I too made a quick good faith effort to find sources in English, and even a cursory search on a regional search engine. I didn't find anything approaching something that would be considered an RS, which is unfortunately fairly typical of articles in this subject area. It might have marginally borderline notability, but with the amount of promotional puffery out there for Indian films (which are a dime a dozen), and the sometimes questionable reliability of informational outlets from India (which are often not independent, or subject to good editorial oversight)- it can be hard to tell. I'm not opposed to the article being recreated, if notability can be established with some reliable secondary sources. This may be a case of "not now". Quinto Simmaco (talk) 04:01, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Can't find sources in the English searches to show it passes notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:06, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.