Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aliki Theofilopoulos Grafft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) ^[SSTflyer] 14:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aliki Theofilopoulos Grafft[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As it stands, there is not really much in this article, unless it can be expanded and more references added to establish notability. nyuszika7h (talk) 14:12, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 15:40, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Her roles in animation as animator, writer, voice actor, producer and director seem to be enough to pass NACTOR. I added some referenced roles to the page. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:57, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete instead and Draft afterwards as I could've accepted the Daytime Emmy, but there's still nothing else particularly confidently convincing, thus delete at best. SwisterTwister talk 19:40, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Megalibrarygirl. Voice actors can be just as notable as those who appear in person on film. This number of credits and awards passes NACTOR. Montanabw ^(talk) 20:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I will allow this another relist to see if a clearer consensus can form. KaisaL (talk) 01:22, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KaisaL (talk) 01:22, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.