Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalma (dish)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cuisine of Odisha#Dals and curries. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dalma (dish)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little encyclopedic content, poorly sourced (no references), unlinked, and no established proof of notability. A cooking recipe simply does not belong in Wikipedia. EmperorNapoléonI (talk) 23:39, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 December 16. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 00:01, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 00:18, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Cuisine of Odisha#Dals and curries as unfortunately not much info on this - With the greatest of respect the nom should've been WP:BOLD and redirected himself. –Davey2010 • (talk) 02:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did consider redirecting the page, but I thought that because I was a relatively novice editor I'd consult other, more experienced reviewers per the AfD process. Thanks for the advice, though. EmperorNapoléonI (talk) 06:00, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. There's been some cleanup, but I'm still not clear on the notability issue. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 19:32, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Davey2010. There is little reason to have an article that exactly duplicates a paragraph in another article. In that article I think it's OK, as a type of dish rather than a recipe. – Margin1522 (talk) 04:37, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above accurate analysis. Cavarrone 10:56, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.