Talk:Fire Emblem
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fire Emblem article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Fire Emblem" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 555 days |
Fire Emblem has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
Fire Emblem is the main article in the Main Fire Emblem series series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
Media franchises GA‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Threat of Cancellation
Shouldn't there be something about the reported threat of cancellation prior to the release, critical acclaim, and tremendous success of Fire Emblem Awakening? Here's a source.
Sakurai says Fire Emblem Heroes is NOT a spin-off
7:07, Sakurai says that Three Houses is the 17th game in the series and that Heroes is not a spin-off. [1]
- ^ Nintendo. "Super Smash Bros. Ultimate – Mr. Sakurai Presents "Byleth"". Youtube. Retrieved 7 April 2020.
- Only noticed now, but no, this is dumb, I've reverted. A YouTube video of somebody who doesn't even work on Fire Emblem is not remotely a good source compared to voluminous sourcing elsewhere that calls Heroes a spin-off. This wasn't even close to a good source, I certainly hope you aren't using random videos of non-authorities on a topic in such a cavalier fashion elsewhere. SnowFire (talk) 19:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Fates Special Edition Mistake?
In the Games section of the article, we find the sentence "Fates was later re-released as a special version with all three versions included." I believe this is false; the special version in question refers to the Special Edition, which was released at the launch of the game and was actually the only way to play Revelations for the first few weeks after launch. I don't believe there's any other version that contains all three paths, but even if there is, failing to mention the original special edition (which is also the only way to have Revelations physically) seems like an oversight. I can't make the edit myself, as I've never edited Wikipedia and the article is currently semi-protected, but I figured I'd mention it here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:681:601:AEA0:0:0:0:5644 (talk) 19:31, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Video games good articles
- GA-Class Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia featured topics Main Fire Emblem series good content
- Mid-importance Featured topics articles
- Old requests for peer review
- GA-Class video game articles
- Mid-importance video game articles
- GA-Class Nintendo articles
- Nintendo task force articles
- Old requests for WikiProject Video Games peer review
- WikiProject Video games articles
- GA-Class media franchise articles
- Mid-importance media franchise articles
- WikiProject Media franchises articles