Jump to content

Talk:Double Jeopardy Clause

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 98.115.35.76 (talk) at 01:20, 30 June 2022 (→‎justification for non-capital cases). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The section regarding this film is not well-verified. It needs improvements, or it shall be removed. --George Ho (talk) 02:16, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reworded a few things and added inline citations to external sources. Have another look at it. If you still have concerns, please be specific in listing your concerns. Arcturis (talk) 00:01, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hopefully, it is better. Hopefully, the section follows exactly what the sources say. And original analyses are omitted, thankfully, unless I'm proven wrong. --George Ho (talk) 01:36, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This whole section should be put into the movie article with just a "See Also..." at the end. There are lots of fictional movies including the double jeopardy law. There are lots of movies with legal mistakes in them - there's a website dedicated to movie mistakes, they aren't important to the actual law. 91.125.105.194 (talk) 21:41, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Legal Sentence

"Jeopardy attaches in jury trial ", please translate from legalese into English. 91.125.105.194 (talk) 21:41, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Justification for Non-capital Cases

Need content on why "life or limb" applies to non-capital cases. Six months in jail does not entail life or limb, does it? 98.115.35.76 (talk) 01:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]