User talk:HarlandQPitt

Sam Jordison page

Dear HarlandQPitt, Thankyou for your feedback, taken on board. I will work on it. I think as one of modern Britain's most read authors, the writer merits having a page. Thankyou...

Thanks again..I'll keep working on it....SunShiningOnWater (talk) 20:49, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Me

I didn't do anything! What did I do wrong?

Suggestions

Hey do you have any suggestions on how I can improve the Mike Kerr article?

Thanks! --Stuartsanders (talk) 04:45, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again!

I'll try to re-post with more references, and it was also deleted too quickly before I could save the article.

--Stuartsanders (talk) 04:59, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trampsketball

Trampsketball is a sport on the rise but a sport none the less please stop putting it up for a fast deletion. If you watch the some of the videos under the video catergory on the page you will see it is a not fake i will change something if you are not happy with it.Jradz3 (talk) 03:35, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete of "Pacific Cartoon Academy"

When proposing an article for speedy deletion as a hoax I find it easier to use the plain db template and include a more detailed rationalle i.e. {{db|reason}} (You can't currently give a reason with an a3 tag although I've proposed that this be changed). At the very least I'd include a reason in your edit description. Otherwise how is an admin, who may be totally unfamilar with the area, going to know for certain it's a hoax? They won't delete it without being certain and if it looks like it might be genuine they're also likely to remove the tag as was done here. Dpmuk (talk) 21:55, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Watkins

I declined the speedy deletion of this page as the subject has played first-class (i.e. professional) cricket, albeit for only one game. Regards, -- Flyguy649 ^talk 05:14, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Baughman.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Baughman.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 17:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your rollback request

Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Denied/January 2009#HarlandQPitt. SoxBot X (talk) 02:00, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your CSD tagging

Please note that G1 is only used for patent nonsense, and does not include vandalism or hoaxes, which may be deleted as vandalism in blatant cases under (G3). --Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:08, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention

Before accusing me of vandalism, you might want to bother ACTUALLY READING THE CONTENT OF MY EDIT instead of going off of the edit summary. I removed a line about cutting an armadillo in half that some Texan probably added from personal experience because being Texan is about blowing mid-sized animals in half with handguns. Then I parodied the removed line in my edit summary, which was completely trivial, but I think destroying buses is about as notable as tearing armadillos in two in a pissing contest.

Thank you for having no attention span or sense of humor. 69.105.172.180 (talk) 16:27, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, I did not realize "Texan" is a profanity. 69.105.172.180 (talk) 16:47, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias

Thanks for taking care of the vandalism on my page, I see that editor has been given some time away from the wiki. I appreciate your help! Dayewalker (talk) 06:03, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice

I've seen your good work reverting vandalism. Well done.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 06:36, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warning vandals

Please be careful to use appropriate warning templates when huggling, rather than just giving out the vandalism template to everyone. Specifically, in this warning you probably should have given the person {{subst:uw-talkinarticle}} rather than {{subst:uw-vandalism4}}; the incorrect warning resulted in the IP's not understanding why they were warned and why their edit was reverted, and a possibly unnecessary block from me (I just saw the vandalism warning, and it wasn't until after blocking that I ended up looking closer at what the IP had been warned for).

You may want to read WP:Vandalism, specifically WP:VAND#NOT, to get a better idea when it's appropriate to warn for vandalism (the term "vandalism" is really overused; a lot of unconstructive edits are not vandalism per se) and when it's better to do a different one. Thanks, rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 04:28, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm not familiar with Huggle so I'm not totally sure how it works. I had been assuming that it let you select a warning template to give them; maybe it doesn't have talkinarticle. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 12:02, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for writing to me. I keep trying to talk to 98.248.32.178 about this but he just ignores me and keeps taking away my tag. I've tried talking to him mulitiple times but he won't answer. Please help! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Taciturnsole (talk • contribs) 00:37, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How do i persue dispute resolution? I keep trying to talk with 98.248.32.178 but he almost never respondes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Taciturnsole (talk • contribs) 00:43, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed speedy deletion tag: Timber Joey

Hi HarlandQPitt! I just wanted to inform you that I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on Timber Joey- because: I'll turn it into a redirect instead If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. decltype (talk) 21:04, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User 132.3.9.68

I thought I should let you know that user 132.3.9.68 vandalize another page

[1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.150.84.88 (talk) 18:16, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Surya Experience deletion

Dude, this band performs at the Palmilla hotel at Los Cabos on a daily basis, where John Travolta made his anniversary party last year, also the frontman of this band actually is Javier Asencio, a mega-known famous multi instrument musician born in Argentina. They have been playing on the Argentinian scene for years.Several people asks about the band after going to the Los Cabos, Mexico (Lower California) hotel Palmilla (important celebrities) so that is why I strongly believe they should be included in Wikipedia. They are getting very well known and it is important that their name appear in the FREE encyclopedia, because there's people looking for them. Thanks Rostik (article creator) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rostik80 (talk • contribs) 19:12, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:List of characters from Total Drama Island

Hi HarlandQPitt. My bad here. I'm not how that happened but User:81.182.84.8 was obviously not defacing List of characters from Total Drama Island at all with that edit. I'll see what I can do to fix the error. Thanks for letting me know. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:00, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that catch. I must have closed the window without pressing "confirm."

		The Original Barnstar
		For being watchful and quickly catching a problem when you saw it. Thanks HarlandQPitt! Malinaccier (talk) 00:29, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User Doctorfacts

Sorry to bother you but user “Doctorfacts” has been deleting info, a few other things and giving no reason for doing so and nobody of higher power around here is doing anything about it. I mean isn't that vandalism? [2] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.150.83.169 (talk) 00:29, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mga Awit sa Pagsamba

Greetings from the Islands Philippines!

Indeed, you were right in saying the I haven't cited any sources... Yet... As you can see, the page is just being created and i'm still in the process of putting them.

Thank you very much and Godbless you! Jayzl Nebre-Villfania (talk) 04:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You!

Thank you for reverting Soulplaya 63's vandalism on my talk page! I really appreciate the help, as I was running late for a meeting. Thanks again! Wickedlyperfect18 (talk) 02:08, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion of The Serenaders page

I wasn't aware of the significance criteria (A7) for pages for band and such. I just wanted to try to get an early start chronicling the band and creating a public repository for information as they've been very active over the past several months, have played a number of shows at notable venues in Atlanta, and are in the process of recording an EP. That said, I understand your finding and I won't disagree that they are not sufficiently "notable" to warrant a page at this point. I'll be back in a few months once they have a bit more of note under their belt. :) --Ecogeek (talk) 15:38, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If I want to ask an admin to userfy the page in question, should I just contact an admin at random, or is there a preferred way to make that request? Thanks for the help! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecogeek (talk • contribs) 15:56, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I kinda realized that after the fact...

I fixed it though. Lilly (talk) 21:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Thanks!

Thanks for the warning! I'll make sure to continue vandalising! --69.31.101.64 (talk) 05:38, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I appreciate your work to clean up the efforts of User:151.200.149.16 to retaliate for my reversion of his earlier work.--Hjal (talk) 05:57, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What?

What did I do wrong?

"You've made this day a special day, by just your being you. There's no person in the whole world like you, and I like you, just the way you are."- Fred Rogers (1928-2003)

For being awesome

For your dedication to keeping Wikipedia free of vandalism, as noticed by me recently. I would like to give you this userbox. More choices at WP:FTA if you want. Personal project of mine. Deagle_AP (talk) 07:05, 27 April 2010 (UTC) (Userbox moved to userpage) HarlandQPitt (talk) 16:54, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Declination of CSD for Emanci

Hello, I just wanted to let you know I declined the CSD for Emanci. Please see WP:BEFORE and my edit summaries. --Morenooso (talk) 07:07, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me get back the page I create a while ago the ballad of peeler the big or e-mail it to me at chiclorraine@gmail.com? I saw you help someone?

I did not purposely vandalize the AVA page

I made a mistake and did not thoroughly read what I was editing. Do not accuse me of vandalism because I am the one who corrected that article when it said that it was unclear if Critter worked on I-Empire or LOVE. (talk) 12:21, 2 May, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

For removing the warning :) --blake 01:06, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism

Back in February, you sent me a warning about vandalizing the 'Teacher' page. This is a mistake; I never noticed the message until today, months later, but I am not a vandal. I never even discovered Wikipedia until recently and this IP is my personal computer, not a shared one. Someone else is responsible and the written reprimand was not needed.

--67.142.171.21 (talk) 15:21, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PBSKIDS

Hello HarlandQPitt, thank you for your contributions on articles related to PBS Kids. I'd like to invite you to become a part of Wikipedia:WikiProject PBSKids, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of PBS Kids articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more information. Thanks!

Leeroy

Your citation, which is a Youtube video (which is not a reliable third-party source, and therefore invalid), only proves that she yelled her name and ran off. It does not prove that the act is, in fact, a reference to the Leeroy meme. There are many similar references in other TV shows (How I Met Your Mother, Moonlight etc etc) that are often added. However, the claim that these are, in fact, references to Leeroy has not been substantiated by a reliable third-party source (for example, by someone asking the show writer and publishing the answer in an interview). They are therefore removed. I have reverted your change again. Your good faith edit is appreciated, but unfortunately unencyclopedic. Metao (talk) 02:31, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Michelle Thomas may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thomas''' (23 September 1968 – 23 December 1978),<ref name=nytimes /><ref name=people/> 1998) was an American actress. She was best known for her roles as Justine Phillips (girlfriend of [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:04, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the extensive discussion on the article's talk page regarding this issue. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 04:10, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, HarlandQPitt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, HarlandQPitt. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, HarlandQPitt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Richard E. Bjork for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard E. Bjork is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard E. Bjork until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tinton5 (talk) 22:20, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:U. E. Baughman.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:U. E. Baughman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 19:30, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]