Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/İbrahim Halil Baran

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Seraphimblade (talk | contribs) at 02:46, 5 October 2022 (İbrahim Halil Baran: Closed as no consensus (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with no prejudice against speedy renomination. In any future discussion, further analysis of the proposed sources would be very helpful in determining a consensus. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:46, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

İbrahim Halil Baran (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of what I found on him where derivatives of the Wikipedia article which was unsourced Paradise Chronicle (talk) 10:43, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 10:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I also found this one from Voice of America Kurdish, (found it over the photograph used in Wikipedia Kurdish).Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:45, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:30, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Delete vote struck as a sock strike.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:22, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Soft Keep- Seems notable per Spiralwidget and Paradise Chronicle. Suryabeej   talk 09:09, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Of the quality sources listed above, two of them are interviews which lack independence. Only one of the sources is independent and has significant coverage of the subject. We require three independent sources with sig cov to pass our notability guidelines. Also, not clear the subject meets any of the criteria at WP:NAUTHOR.4meter4 (talk) 02:17, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.