User talk:Rajeshbieee

This is Rajeshbieee's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13

Proposed deletion of Sabse Bada Beiman

The article Sabse Bada Beiman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews found in a BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 11:59, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kaali Topi Laal Rumaal

The article Kaali Topi Laal Rumaal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews found in a BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:01, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arjun Devaa.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arjun Devaa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vishukkani.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vishukkani.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Insaaf Ki Jung.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Insaaf Ki Jung.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kaali Topi Laal Rumaal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kaali Topi Laal Rumaal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Qurbaniyaan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Qurbaniyaan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sabse Bada Beiman.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sabse Bada Beiman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sanfeer K for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanfeer K is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanfeer K until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:11, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karunguyil Kundram for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karunguyil Kundram is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karunguyil Kundram until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kailash29792 (talk) 06:29, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Engirunthalum Vazhga.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Engirunthalum Vazhga.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Karunguyil Kundram.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Karunguyil Kundram.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:04, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rajeshbieee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am very disappointed that my account has been blocked now. It's heartbreaking because I love wikipedia editing as I can contribute a lot in the subject of cinema and sports. Anyway let me confirm that, I am not into any advertising or promotion for anyone and I am not a paid editor to anyone and I have really followed the guidelines to avoid COI editing, even though I work in film Industry. I humbly request to unblock me, so that I can continue editing wikipedia, a love of my life.Rajeshbieee (talk) 09:39, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you work in the Indian film industry, and you are editing about the Indian film industry, you have not avoided COI editing. You will need to tell us what the nature of your work in the film industry is, you could still be a paid editor even if you are not specifically paid or asked to edit. You will also need to describe how you should make COI related contributions instead of directly. 331dot (talk) 10:04, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot

I am working as an actor as well as Assistant director in films and I have n't created a page (or edited) the films that I have worked. I am surprised about the line, "you could still be a paid editor even if you are not specifically paid or asked to edit". In this case, how can I be a wikipedia editor? Am I supposed to leave working in film industry to make me free from paid/promotional editing accusation..? After the last unblock of my account, I have created almost 100 pages and I have taken atmost care to create those pages following wikipedia guidelines.

The answer to, how make a COI related contribution is; "I should propose changes on the subject's talk page for the same". I hope the concerned people will understand and unblock me, so that I can continue editing, or it will give me mental agony as I love editing wikipedia.Rajeshbieee (talk) 17:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to make another unblock request for someone else to review. If your mental state depends on your ability to edit Wikipedia, I might suggest you seek professional help, for your own sake. 331dot (talk) 17:51, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rajeshbieee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As I have already mentioned, I confirm once again that, I am not into any advertising or promotion for anyone and I am not a paid editor to anyone. Please note that, after the last unblock of my account, I have created almost 100 pages and I have taken atmost care to create those pages following wikipedia guidelines. Hope someone will understand the same and unblock me. Rajeshbieee (talk) 18:27, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below. MER-C 20:01, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Noting that the "care" taken presumably includes their work at Double XL, where they created an article for the film, cited three negative reviews to establish notability, and then neglected to actually mention the negative reception in the article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:38, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Rajeshbieee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I watched the film Double XL and when I checked its wiki page, I found that the page has been redirected after the title page creation. So I removed the redirect and updated details. That's it and I don't know how it became a target to block me and what's the mistake I have done in that page..? This has now became a habit to blame me for some other's work. If this is the case, what's the point in my effort in creating pages following wikipedia guidelines? Why should I prove my innocence everytime and why I am the target..? Atleast people should have checked the last 90+ pages to check my work. This is really disappointing. As I have already mentioned, I confirm once again that, I am not into any advertising or promotion for anyone and I am not a paid editor to anyone. Please unblock me.Rajeshbieee (talk) 02:57, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I watched the film Double XL and when I checked its wiki page, I found that the page has been redirected after the title page creation. So I removed the redirect and updated details. That's it and I don't know how it became a target to block me and what's the mistake I have done in that page..? This has now became a habit to blame me for some other's work. If this is the case, what's the point in my effort in creating pages following wikipedia guidelines? Why should I prove my innocence everytime and why I am the target..? Atleast people should have checked the last 90+ pages to check my work. This is really disappointing. As I have already mentioned, I confirm once again that, I am not into any advertising or promotion for anyone and I am not a paid editor to anyone. Please unblock me.[[User:Rajeshbieee|Rajeshbieee]] ([[User talk:Rajeshbieee#top|talk]]) 02:57, 12 November 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I watched the film Double XL and when I checked its wiki page, I found that the page has been redirected after the title page creation. So I removed the redirect and updated details. That's it and I don't know how it became a target to block me and what's the mistake I have done in that page..? This has now became a habit to blame me for some other's work. If this is the case, what's the point in my effort in creating pages following wikipedia guidelines? Why should I prove my innocence everytime and why I am the target..? Atleast people should have checked the last 90+ pages to check my work. This is really disappointing. As I have already mentioned, I confirm once again that, I am not into any advertising or promotion for anyone and I am not a paid editor to anyone. Please unblock me.[[User:Rajeshbieee|Rajeshbieee]] ([[User talk:Rajeshbieee#top|talk]]) 02:57, 12 November 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I watched the film Double XL and when I checked its wiki page, I found that the page has been redirected after the title page creation. So I removed the redirect and updated details. That's it and I don't know how it became a target to block me and what's the mistake I have done in that page..? This has now became a habit to blame me for some other's work. If this is the case, what's the point in my effort in creating pages following wikipedia guidelines? Why should I prove my innocence everytime and why I am the target..? Atleast people should have checked the last 90+ pages to check my work. This is really disappointing. As I have already mentioned, I confirm once again that, I am not into any advertising or promotion for anyone and I am not a paid editor to anyone. Please unblock me.[[User:Rajeshbieee|Rajeshbieee]] ([[User talk:Rajeshbieee#top|talk]]) 02:57, 12 November 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

@Tito Dutta , @Cyphoidbomb - Kindly check my block / unblock issue. Rajeshbieee (talk) 23:22, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MER-C, @Rosguill, @331dot, @Tito Dutta , @Cyphoidbomb... I am still waiting to get my account unblocked. Rajeshbieee (talk) 15:47, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You could try addressing the specific concern that I raised following the last unblock request. Neglecting to include prose discussing cited, reliable, negative coverage of a topic is a typical sign of COI-editing. Why did you not include any information about the film's negative coverage when creating the article? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:54, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill, I must inform here that, I never created that page (article) in the first place, but only removed the redirect and added the basic details. You can see that I have always updated the reception category of many films that I have created as well as created by others. I agree with you that, if someone does not include any information about the film's negative coverage is a typical sign of COI-editing. See.. I started editing that page only on 10 November 2022‎ with references of many reviews and you blocked me on the same day, not allowing me to do any further editing (in expanding the reception section). If I have not updated anything on reception section does not mean that I have left that page forever, but this time I was blocked from further editing. Rajeshbieee (talk) 16:17, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MER-C, @Rosguill, @331dot, @Tito Dutta , @Cyphoidbomb... I am unable to edit Wikipedia for the last one month and I am still waiting to get my account unblocked. Rajeshbieee (talk) 17:44, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not ping me about this again, please. 331dot (talk) 18:20, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. My apologies. Rajeshbieee (talk) 19:29, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MER-C, @Rosguill, @Tito Dutta, @Cyphoidbomb... New year wishes to all... I hope you people will now do the right steps to unblock me. Please check my explanation posted on 1 December 2022; 16:17. Rajeshbieee (talk) 17:26, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aaya Toofan

The article Aaya Toofan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM. No reviews found in a BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 07:41, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tabaahi – The Destroyer

The article Tabaahi – The Destroyer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM. All I found in a BEFORE were database sites and promotional sites. No reviews

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 16:35, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kahani Kismat Ki (1999 film)

The article Kahani Kismat Ki (1999 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM. Zero reviews found, only databases in a BEFORE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 16:36, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mahasangram

The article Mahasangram has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM, no reviews only database sites found

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:33, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dada (1999 film)

The article Dada (1999 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM, no reviews only database sites found

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:36, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dada (1999 film).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dada (1999 film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kahani Kismat Ki (1999 film).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kahani Kismat Ki (1999 film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tabaahi The Destroyer.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tabaahi The Destroyer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aa Divasam.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aa Divasam.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yeh Sunday Kyun Aata Hai

The article Yeh Sunday Kyun Aata Hai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DareshMohan (talk) 20:48, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Twinkle Twinkle Little Star (2010 film)

The article Twinkle Twinkle Little Star (2010 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable unreleased film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DareshMohan (talk) 20:57, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dhun (film).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dhun (film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yeh Sunday Kyun Aata Hai.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yeh Sunday Kyun Aata Hai.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Unnaipol Oruvan 2009.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Unnaipol Oruvan 2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]