Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julianna Guill

Julianna Guill

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An editor, Jenepidia10, has placed an AfD tag on this article without providing a reason, beyond the following at the talk page: "I propose to delete this page due to lack of notability." See also [1]. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:23, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United States of America. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Snow Keep – This a 'C-class' article, so there is no question that it is sufficiently sourced (and likely can be sourced further: see this discussion as well), and there is also no question that the subject easily clears WP:NACTOR since her breakthrough in Friday the 13th (2009 film). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 January 12. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:32, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, subject clearly meets WP:NACTOR based on substantial roles, including a main role in a current TV series. BD2412 T 02:45, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: subject has received plenty of significant coverage in reliable sources to pass WP:BASIC. ––FormalDude (talk) 02:47, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Most of her parts are bit parts or one-offs, other than the Sweet 16 movie, which itself seems barely notable for Wiki. Oaktree b (talk) 04:53, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Appears to meet WP:NACTOR 38.140.49.92 (talk) 06:37, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and North Carolina. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:17, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Certainly doesn’t seem to meet the notability guidelines.She has mostly only had very small roles which are not noteworthy. Shsuhxttuserjame (contribs • talk) 21:16, 16 January 2023 (UTC) — Shsuhxttuserjame (talk • contribs)[reply]