Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazakhstan President Cup (football)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 15:10, 31 January 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  07:28, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kazakhstan President Cup (football)[edit]

Kazakhstan President Cup (football) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe this organization meets the notability criteria of WP:FOOTBALL. Article contains no citations to help ascertain this. KDS4444Talk 09:23, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - it's not an organization but an annual international tournament that receives sufficient coverage[1]. Current edition includes teams from seven former USSR republics and Spain, who also won last year. I'll try to clean it up. МандичкаYO 😜 12:31, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - additionally this is a brand new article and the creator continues to add more information. МандичкаYO 😜 13:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment As far as I am aware, WP:FOOTBALL have no notability criteria that would relate to a tournament like this (there is nothing listed here). Number 57 15:38, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I would think regularly GNG applies to sporting events. It has lots of coverage in Russian of course, but Spanish as well - [2]. 5,000+ hits and this is Spain's second year participating. So I think it's pretty safe. МандичкаYO 😜 21:58, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Am I correct in understanding that this is a children's tournament, and that no one over the age of 17 is allowed to play? This makes it sound like a football summer camp for kids. KDS4444Talk 17:54, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
KDS4444: No, it's not a "children's tournament" but an U-17 international. U-17 is a well-covered age division in international sports as this is the next generation - see FIFA U-17 World Cup and entire category: Category:Under-17 association football МандичкаYO 😜 08:45, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:30, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:31, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:31, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:13, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - As noted above, seems to meet GNG in non-English sources. Needs expanding by a native speaker. Fenix down (talk) 07:25, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no evidence of notability, coverage not sufficient for GNG as far as I'm concerned, as it is not "significant" about the competition itself. GiantSnowman 11:34, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Did you see the link I posted? There are about 10,000 news stories about it. How is coverage insufficient? МандичкаYO 😜 08:45, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 07:12, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 14:02, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.