Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017–18 South Shields F.C. season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  10:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017–18 South Shields F.C. season

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NSEASONS by some margin – the club plays in the eighth tier of English football, well below the fully-professional divisions. Prod removed by article's creator. Number 5 7 08:52, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:11, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:11, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:13, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:16, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NSEASONS. Appreciate that their season might get more than average coverage for a team at this level because Julio Arca plays for them, but I anticipate most of this coverage will be focused on him and should belong in his article, not a standalone season article. Fenix down (talk) 09:38, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak Keep~~ People tend to forget the match report url's that are in the match statistics section, these act as citations although hidden and I really don't like how they seem hidden in season articles, I see enough for a weak keep on this. Govvy (talk) 18:57, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Govvy: The match reports are from the club's own website so do not demonstrate any form of notability. Number 5 7 19:51, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

O, not so smart, I thought it was independent of the club, I missed that! Delete then. Govvy (talk) 19:56, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 19:25, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to South Shields F.C., which WP:NSEASONS says should be done when the season is not notable but the team or competition is. Smartyllama (talk) 13:25, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Smartyllama: Perhaps I'm mistaken, but I read that (the redirecting possibility) as being for when an article is viable but currently only consists of stats. This article doesn't meet the requirements full stop. Number 5 7 14:13, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c)  11:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As the team doesn't fall in the WP:NSEASONS as they are too low down the English pyrmaid to be notable Matt294069 is coming 05:03, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly excessive; redundant to South Shields F.C. and 2017–18 Northern Premier League. Power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.