Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/50/50 burger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 04:53, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

50/50 burger

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

trivial gimmicky foodstuff. The nearest thing to a RS, the Daily News, does not use this name. The Huffington Post story does not fully support the material here. The name is the name of the restaurant,and I assume the article is promotional for them. DGG ( talk ) 13:26, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Not promotional to restaurant. Daily news plus this used the name 50/50 founder Scott Slater, which is made of 100% ground bacon and topped. Obviously notable as per GNG. A.Minkowiski^{_Lets t@lk} 14:58, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Sources in the article plus Huffington Post (different article), UT San Diego and several other hits on a google search (although most are not reliable) mean it does pass GNG. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:51, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The topic has received adequate coverage to qualify for an article, per WP:GNG. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:31, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Rename and Rewrite - the sources are reliable, it seems the article should be about the restaurant. The burger has no notability outside the restaurant. 78.26 (His Wiki's Voice) 19:43, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.