Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arena Ponte Preta
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 10:31, 5 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 10:31, 5 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Associação Atlética Ponte Preta. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 13:23, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Arena Ponte Preta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no indication of notability. [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 02:50, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:30, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:30, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:30, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, yes there is indication of notability in the article itself. An a quick google search gives plenty of backing for notability claims. --Soman (talk) 05:50, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Associação Atlética Ponte Preta, no evidence of independent notability but probable search term. GiantSnowman 15:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 10:39, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - per GS. article in the Ponte Preta site indicates it is a genuine proposal, but at the moment, would be WP:CRYSTAL for its own article. If anything, the time line on the club site indicates that plans have stalled. Worth comment in the club article, but there does not appear to be sufficient detail available, or confirmation when / if the stadium will actually be built to justify standalone article. Fenix down (talk)
- Redirect per GiantSnowman. --MicroX (talk) 04:29, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.