Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diane Anderson-Minshall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear consensus to keep. bd2412 T 20:30, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diane Anderson-Minshall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Journalist/author whose book holdings number only in the single to mid double-digits (WorldCat). References are all web pages (many broken links). There is a trivial mention in NYT (a short quote), but main claim seems to be a number of non-notable awards, like "official community honoree of L.A. Pride". The article is filled with OR and was created by a short-lived SPA account 10 years ago. Seems like this is an article that the community should have a look at. Agricola44 (talk) 15:16, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:38, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:38, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:38, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:38, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:GNG. Hmlarson (talk) 05:27, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. "Keep per WP:GNG" seems basically to be what you plaster on every woman-related AfD. Do you have a script that does this automatically 🙂? Seriously, some amount of searching suggests she does not actually pass GNG because the awards are obscure, coverage is trivial, etc. Is there something I've missed? Thanks, Agricola44 (talk) 14:53, 11 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Strange - I don't recall seeing your username before in AfDs related to women. If I had a script, I'd be sure to share it with you. ;-) Hmlarson (talk) 18:47, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, sources are adequate and achievements sufficiently important to meet the GNG threshold. 18:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Montanabw (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:26, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:41, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Between the coverage and awards granted to this person, this does pass our thresholds of notability. The nom might not like an award by the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association, Golden Crown Literary Society or others, but that's their opinion and not related to our guidelines. --Oakshade (talk) 01:51, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please to clarify what you mean by "nom might not like an award by..."? Agricola44 (talk) 18:23, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.