Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Turtle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:19, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Turtle[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP fails GNG: 0 indi RS, 1 primary non-indi, n x IMDBs (non-RS per WP:RS/IMDB), other dead primary sources failed verification. The company appears to exist and there's passing mentions in at least one book. (the current promo and WP:NOTINHERITED namedrops lead me to believe it's a WP:TNT) Widefox; talk 13:37, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:56, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- an unremarkable producer. The article had me at "He has achieved great success in the genres of action, comedy, horror, science fiction and drama!" Such content is explicitly excluded per WP:NOTSPAM. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:41, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 02:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per WP:BLP. Majority of cited content comes from iMDB, and additional reliable sources could not be located. Comatmebro (talk) 04:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - searches did not turn up enough to show he passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:09, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.