Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lake Shore Boulevard Bailey Bridge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 15:46, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lake Shore Boulevard Bailey Bridge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested WP:PROD. Non-notable temporary bridge. MickMacNee (talk) 20:26, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See also Old Finch Avenue Bailey Bridge -Arb. (talk) 23:04, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete What is the significance of the bridge? Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 02:08, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - its not a temporary bridge, its a permanent fixture. And thinking back, I seem to recall it being used as the start finish of the indy car race course, although for the life of me, I can find no Ref for that :/ Exit2DOS ^{• Ctrl • Alt • Del} 04:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As one of only two Bailey bridges in Toronto, we want this article to sake of making the encyclopedia complete and comprehensive. We should also seek to cover all heritage listed things. The fact that a group has made the effort to list the thing is more than enough evidence of notability. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:16, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - It's significant enough to be written about in this book. -- Whpq (talk) 17:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources found. Bearian (talk) 20:38, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per arguments above. The bridge is not a temporary structure, and its method of construction plays no part in its notability, unless that construction was notable itself. Notability is evidenced by the links above. Martin451 (talk) 02:37, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.