Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern Telecom home phones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:34, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Telecom home phones

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NOTDIR. Wikipedia is not for simple listings of telephone models, and any notable information should be in the main Nortel article. SophisticatedSwampert ^Talk _contribs 01:16, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 04:30, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 04:30, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete can't see how this can pass WP:LISTN. Ajf773 (talk) 02:07, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, postdlf (talk) 19:43, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:56, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:50, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Could be developed into an acceptable article in the model of Nortel payphones and Nortel business phones. WP:LISTN is not the applicable criteria here. This article is about the phones manufactured by one company over an 80 year period. ~Kvng (talk) 20:23, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:10, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article is not properly done as per Wikipedia guidelines, including proper establishment of notability.TH1980 (talk) 03:18, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.