Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parma F.C. strip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:43, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Parma F.C. strip

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of the last of a series of articles about a football club's kit. Previous AfDs have all resulted in deletion (plus more), mainly due to lack of independent notability. The only section solidly referenced (the city's traditional colours, etc.) appears to be a re-hash of content already present in the parent article, Parma F.C. Most of the rest is a gallery with negligible encyclopaedic value. C 679 20:41, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C 679 20:46, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. C 679 04:39, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Parma F.C.. Notable content but not notable enough for a stand alone article. IJA (talk) 10:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per consensus at this AfD and this AfD and this AfD and this AfD and this AfD and this AfD and this AfD and this AfD and this AfD. Giant Snowman 13:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per GiantSnowman. IJA (talk) 10:12, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete More than sufficient precedent. -- Jkudlick ^tc_s 02:30, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per previous consensus, nothing in this article to suggest that the kit itself has been subject to any significant coverage that would satisfy GNG outside pf routine announcements about changes in style. Fenix down (talk) 19:29, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.