Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Work (project management)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This page has already been deleted, I am closing as delete because XFDcloser has failed to close the discussion (non-admin closure)   Kadzi   (talk) 20:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Work (project management)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article, with no substantive edits for at least 3 years, is unreferenced except for an external link; unfinished with no indication of any intent to finish it; and the lead is either so poorly written or so poorly translated as to be incomprehensible (to me, at least). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:59, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 09:13, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, even the external link amounts to nothing of comprehensible substance. Hyperbolick (talk) 16:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTDICT: this doesn't seem valuable as a concept in its own right as distinct from Work (human activity)/project management etc. It's perhaps a technical usage of the word "work" distinct from more general uses, but we're not a dictionary. — Bilorv (talk) 16:59, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Complete gobbledygook. And what's worse, it has been incorrectly linked to the 'work' article on all those other-language wikis; just imagine looking at the German article on 'Arbeit (Sozialwissenschaften)', then clicking the English link and seeing this! How nobody has picked up on that in all these years is beyond me. Little point in even listing all the policies this little gem falls foul of — just get rid of it. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:24, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not completely insane, a short definition within the discipline of project management, but there's nothing here worth saving. BTW @DoubleGrazing: I've just fixed the interwiki linkage to a more sensible choice, good heads-up there, thank you. --Lockley (talk) 02:22, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete similar result to hitting the next word on autocomplete. PainProf (talk) 04:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - unsourced and incomprehensible. There appear to be several related articles which are almost as bad, including Duration (project management). power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:33, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.