Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tywanna Smith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:54, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tywanna Smith

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. I don't see any way the person meets WP:NSPORT, and the purpose of the article appears to be to promote her (non-notable) business. Power~enwiki (talk) 21:46, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:02, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:02, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:02, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:04, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Business related information was deleted- I wasn't aware that only sports related information was acceptable for content. Aleksej Nikolić is of lesser notability but has a page? I am very confused. Jacobbailer (talk) 23:12, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aleksej Nikolić played in the EuroLeague which meets WP:NBASKETBALL (because of the news coverage the EuroLeague gets). Can you find some sources about her professional career from reliable sources to improve the article? -- Dammit_steve (talk) 00:06, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will do Jacobbailer (talk) 14:07, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jacobbailer - this person's article may meet other notability guidelines such as WP:NCOLLATH or WP:GNG, but needs additional references included to reflect that. Hmlarson (talk) 05:46, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hmlarson Dammit_steve I added close to 10 new sources-does that work? I can add more if that's not enough.Jacobbailer (talk) 00:46, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The goal isn't to link every web page that mentions her: anybody with Google could do that. Read WP:N for what notability actually means - in-depth and more than local coverage. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:13, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A classic case of WP:ROUTINE. The press coverage outside of college papers is almost all quick mentions, team sheet listings etc. We may wish that women's basketball got the same press coverage as men's football or politics, but it doesn't and therefore WP:GNG is not met. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Colapeninsula Her professional work post-basketball has press mentions of the type you are talking about, for example, a Huffington Post article was recently published I believe. I'll try to restructure for that as a smaller page. Jacobbailer (talk) 13:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 12:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Hmlarson (talk) 03:02, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.