Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snow Business (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete !votes. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:54, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Snow Business (company)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

advertising The Banner talk 22:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Though there is some promotional material in the article, it would be a minor job to rewrite and make it more encyclopedic.The company is notable, there are reliable sources cited, and the article provides a wealth of material on a rather fascinating topic. Work is definitely needed (is the filmography necessary?), but this article should be kept and improved. - Gorthian (talk) 06:52, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and stubify, for while it has been the subject of multiple secondary sources, it reads as highly promotional throughout, with pretty much no citations outside of the lead. – 23W _{(talk · contribs)} 09:48, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Appears to meet GNG. Promotional content and inappropriate writing style should be cut, though. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:16, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed and revised most of the promotional material – pretty much anything outside the lead. – 23W _{(talk · contribs)} 23:02, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:23W, good job. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 10:30, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"SNOW" Keep per meeting WP:COMPANY AND WP:GNG. Well nominator?? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 10:29, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will not be too harsh here, but the radical edit of User:23W turned it into an acceptable article, although it still contains some fluff. Request speedy close as keep, as nominator. The Banner talk 10:34, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I should add that its the way the article was for a couple of months before a new user started expanding the article with no references. – 23W _{(talk · contribs)} 17:15, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.