Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The RISC Group (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 00:27, 12 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 00:27, 12 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:55, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- The RISC Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no notability shown for this company. lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. nothing satisfying wp:corp. prod remove after challenge by ip "There is no reason for this page to be deleted, it provides information on a group that will no doubt become quite popular quite soon." WP:CRYSTAL. last afd closed no consensus due to lack of participation. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:52, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't appear to be notable. Eeekster (talk) 04:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't find anything to establish notability. ~~ GB fan ~~ talk 05:52, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not notable. The IP mentioned should review WP:CRYSTAL. Jusdafax 08:15, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:CORP for lack of sources. LibStar (talk) 12:14, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete does not pass notability or WP:CORP because there are no reliable, independent sources. Reyk YO! 12:52, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: all has been said. Dewritech (talk) 13:51, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:SNOW and WP:CRYSTAL. SnottyWong converse 15:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No sources to show meets WP:CORP so have to conclude not notable. Codf1977 (talk) 08:06, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.