Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Shadows (professional wrestling)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 00:46, 12 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Los Conquistadores. – Joe (talk) 00:42, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Shadows (professional wrestling)[edit]

The Shadows (professional wrestling) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Random jobber tag team that is so unnotable, it isn't even mentioned in Moondog Rex's article. I'm sure a sentence or two would suffice, while Jose Luis' article probably gives more information than is necessary. Feedback 10:12, 21 November 2017 (UTC) Feedback 10:12, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Object, team was a notable jobber tag-team and article should be kept, and I now added a source that states that Moondog Rex was Shadow I, does that now suffice? Davidgoodheart (talk) 10:35, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:03, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - No reason for this to be deleted, as the information is fine; but should be merged with the topic for Los Conquistadores; a much more well known team, with the same people in it. A gimmick change doesn't really need a new article. Lee Vilenski(talk) 09:42, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  12:39, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.