User talk:I LOVE YOU JACOB SARTORIUS XOXOXO

I forgot my other account password. I LOVE YOU JACOB SARTORIUS XOXOXO (talk) 22:52, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, I LOVE YOU JACOB SARTORIUS XOXOXO! Thank you for your contributions. I am RickinBaltimore and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:14, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just as a side note, I happen to think both the articles created are notable enough to be kept. I understand you might be frustrated with the whole process, and I really would like to help you out. The recent comment you left on the Sweatshirt AfD though is barely understandable, which is why I removed it. The other comment "I waited 7 seconds" though strikes me a trolling, or vandalism. If you want to have the articles kept, they could be improved on as more sources come out for the song and artist. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:16, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if it looked like trolling or vandalism. I said that because people keep trying to get it deleted and I couldn't even edit the page. I would have to wait like 3 more days. I just want to get the page deleted so I can put it somewhere else. I LOVE YOU JACOB SARTORIUS XOXOXO (talk) 20:27, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's in the right place though for now. He's already notable, and as that grows, more sources and such will come out about him. I know you're on a 48 hour block, when it's over I'd suggest just let the AfDs run their course. The Jacob Sartorius article i'm thinking will be kept, the song one is up in the air. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:36, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RickinBaltimore is absolutely correct. Nothing will be deleted within the next day, the discussion will play out, and when your block expires you'll have time to join the discussion regarding the notability of the artist and song before the discussion is closed. I know you're new here, but I believe the discussion you added appeared to say precisely the opposite of the outcome you desire. In the meantime, how about reading WP:RELIABLE while you are prevented from editing, as a friendly suggestion? 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:29, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Disruptive Editing at AFD and AIV. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 20:19, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I LOVE YOU JACOB SARTORIUS XOXOXO (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block is unjust. Why do I get locked out of pages that I helped make, not get to comment on the articles for deletion for those pages, get reported for vandalism if I keep trying to comment and then get blocked for "Disruptive editing"? And someone keeps vandalizing those pages [1] [2] [3] and most recently [4]. That person gets to edit those pages but I don't? That person doesn't get blocked and keeps getting warnings but I don't? I LOVE YOU JACOB SARTORIUS XOXOXO (talk) 21:46, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you are unable to understand how your actions at the AfD were disruptive, you do not have the required competence to edit Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:25, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

you really should unblock me admins

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I LOVE YOU JACOB SARTORIUS XOXOXO (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Another one [5]. (If that edit is still there and any admin sees it from my talkpage and then just reverts without unblocking me isn't that hypocritical or snobby or whatever? You have me blocked like I'm not helpful and then take credit for my work.) Unblock me so I can revert that edit. I also need to sort out the mess at articles for deletion, yes I am the biggest contributor to those two articles and you won't let me comment on them? Sounds like unjust violations of WP:OWNERSHIP by the wikipedia admins.

And this "Rose Sartorius" girl is claiming false WP:OWNERSHIP of the article. I added a majority of the (sourced) information and citations [6] [7] and submitted the article for review [8]. All she did was add unsourced, misformatted information, not a single citiation made by her. [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] I already cleaned up some of her mess. Here are two more of her edits that still need to be reverted or cited. [16] [17] (Again with being hypocritical or snobby or whatever.)

And then Jacob Sartorius article needs to be deleted or moved back to draftspace, it's not sufficiently notable, I agree with SwisterTwister's decision to reject it. [18] Leaving it up will just attract more vandalism, misinformation, and good-faith, but unsourced information by fans, which is inappropriate for any article, especially a high profile BLP. We are doing no service to him by keeping it up. (Being on wikipedia is not a career goal or something that you should necessarily put on your resume. And I'm looking at you Osama, Omar Mateen, Adam Lanza, Micah Xavier Johnson, Snooki and others. Okay, maybe some of them do appreciate being on wikipedia, but were talking about a 13 year old boy here. How would you feel if some random person put in false information in a highly viewed page about you? I know I wouldn't like that.)

If I could fix it I would but I can't because my account isn't old enough. I had a longer comment to make at the articles for deletion page before I was blocked but the stupid edit filter stooped me. If I remain unblocked, can you go over there, tell them that I want it deleted or drafted, link to my talk page and tell them to read my comment? I will leave it as soon as you do that and then I'll allow you to block me forever. Thanks! I LOVE YOU JACOB SARTORIUS XOXOXO (talk) 03:33, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See WP:NOTTHEM. You should focus on the issues with your own edits, not those with other edits. This block will run out in a few hours, but if your conduct doesn't change, you will be blocked again soon, for longer. Huon (talk) 12:06, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't think Wikipedia is the project for you right now. Maybe in a few years, but not now. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 05:08, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I don't think you should be an admin, but that won't really change anything will it? Either unblock me, block me forever, or block me for "a few years". Instead of telling me that, tell me to grow up and do something just do it! We should switch places. I LOVE YOU JACOB SARTORIUS XOXOXO (talk) 05:59, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Test12

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 3primetime3 (talk) 05:44, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address per person. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 06:27, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IP address doesn't really mean anything. I LOVE YOU JACOB SARTORIUS XOXOXO (talk) 06:30, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning before much longer block

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:10, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely, per WP:NOTHERE and WP:CIR

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:58, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:08, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]