Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Ke Chakkar Mein
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:29, 1 March 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Nomination withdrawn after clean-up. (Non-admin closure) Suraj T 18:58, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Love Ke Chakkar Mein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable film, fails WP:NF. — Abhishek Talk 02:43, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Abhishek Talk 02:46, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Sure was a mess when nominated. I'm happy to report that User:Akb96's unsourced stub article that was nominated for deletion 6 hours after its creation, has NOW been expanded and sourced. Took about an hour to fix up the sorry stub and turn it into something that better serves the project. I think if it remains it will be further improved over time and through regular editing.Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Significant coverage now. Passes WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 22:43, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Per coverage in IndiaGlitz (see article). Northamerica1000(talk) 07:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per reliable sources added and cleanup done by User:MichaelQSchmidt. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 22:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per the above - good cleanup work, that. No question about notability now. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 13:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- After taking a look at the article now, I too believe it needs to stay, hence I am withdrawing my nomination. — Abhishek Talk 15:11, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.