Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PUMP Audio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:16, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PUMP Audio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created for promotional purposes as the creator is involved with the company. For this reason I am also nominating Adam Blair (entrepreneur) and Drive Protect (related articles created by the same editor) for deletion; the Adam Blair article has been tagged for notability for two years and the Drive Protect article was previously listed on a website like eLance or PeoplePerHour as a requested article for payment (I watchlisted the Drive Protect title after spotting the advert, hence coming across these other articles when it was recently created). The PUMP Audio article was prodded, but the prod was removed by the creator after I had advised them to cease editing the article due to their conflict of interest. Number 5 7 15:52, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 16:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 16:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is an ad, not an encyclopedia article, and the company fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG by a wide margin. Rentier (talk) 20:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 08:16, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:SPAM masquerading as an article. Sources fail WP:CORPDEPTH. shoy (reactions) 13:29, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete References do not meet high notability. Maybe notable within the region or some area but not yet eligible to get an article on Wikipedia Chrisswill (talk) 21:44, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.