Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otto Kerkhoven

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 07:30, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Otto Kerkhoven

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~BLP~~ Bio with 1 UGC wiki, 1 primary, so fails GNG. Quick Google and book search didn't find anything. Widefox; talk 14:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 16:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 16:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 16:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination (although person is not living) – Editør (talk) 10:21, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thx, corrected. Widefox; talk 14:36, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Serving on a municipal council is not an automatic WP:NPOL pass in and of itself, but nothing else here constitutes strong evidence of notability for other reasons. An article could certainly be recreated in the future if somebody can locate stronger evidence of notability and better reliable sourcing about him than this, but nothing present here is even really claiming, let alone properly sourcing, anything that would make him eligible. Bearcat (talk) 18:48, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.