Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satyajeet Tambe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Legobot (talk | contribs) at 08:52, 13 March 2023 (Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (2x)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:52, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Satyajeet Tambe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is local politician and has some passing mentions in few sources. And that is precisely because he is son of MLC Sudhir Tambe, and nephew of Balasaheb Thorat - but notability is not inherited. He contested 2014 state election and lost - Fails WP:NPOL. Lastly, doesn't qualify for WP:GNG as well for lacking substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources.

This news article (published by Times of India) calls him - "Congress legislator Satyajeet Tambe", which I tried to cross-check and found that it is a typo (they meant to write "Sudhir Tambe"). Anup [Talk] 21:08, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This reads like a Linkedin entry, full of words like "passionate". Bacially it says he has potential to become notable, so even the article itself shouts the subject is not notable at present.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:55, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Wikipedia is not a free PR platform on which everybody who exists is entitled to have an article. Nothing here is a strong claim of notability, and the article is stuffed with POV descriptors like "passionate" and "promising". No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when he accomplishes something that actually gives him an WP:NPOL pass — but nothing here gets him a Wikipedia article today. Bearcat (talk)
  • Strong Delete-Fails WP:NOTABILITY.This is not a PR platform,as said above!Aru@baska❯❯❯ Vanguard 14:00, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.