Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 October 26
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
The Linkery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD)) The assertion of notability in this case is not based on the restaurant's no-tipping policy. Rather, the restaurant has received fairly substantial coverage in print media, most significantly in a New York Times magazine feature article. I believe this fact more than satisfies the inclusion criteria for standalone articles, according to WP:N. As for the {{prod}}, there were two things wrong with it. First, it should been an {{notability}}. According to WP:N, {{prod}} should be used when appropriate sources cannot be found to demonstrate the notability of its subject. This article was appropriately sourced to the New York Times magazine. Second, User:Dr.frog failed to place an alert on my talk page, so I was unable to respond to the {{prod}} in a timely manner. Beefyt (talk) 19:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC) |
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. | ||||||
Image was speedy deleted outside of the established criteria and I believe it needs a full discussion within an actual ifd to decide if it in actuality should be deleted. Justmeherenow ( ) 18:46, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
I challenged via a "hangon" tag the proposed speedy deletion of the image of the book cover; but instead of my challenge facilitating there being listed a discussion, the image was simply deleted, which action I wish to appeal as a process violation, due both its lack of transparency and its lack of providing an appropriate venue of discussion. Justmeherenow ( ) 19:26, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
| ||||||
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Weedpunk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD)) Article was speedy deleted as a hoax. According to the Speedy Deletion Criteria, being a hoax is a "non-criteria", and it states If even remotely plausible, a suspected hoax article should be subjected to further scrutiny in a wider forum. The previous AfD (over 8 months ago) was not conclusive on whether it was a hoax and was deleted on the basis of needing more sources. Those sources have been found and the article was substantially improved, and it should not have been speedy deleted, but rather if the editor in question found it questionable it should have been brought to AfD. Banime (talk) 14:17, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Blue Senturion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD)) Through my watchlist, I saw that an IP address had changed a template, and when I saw the change, I found that this page was deleted (I've replaced it with a redirect for now). Firstly, this AFD had very little commenting on it, only four. Secondly, this article, just like all articles, have room for improvement, and it is very likely that these sources ([5] [6] [7] [8] could be used to show that the character has real world notability. Where the article redirects currently to a list of "minor characters" is a misrepresentation of the character. From what I can remember and tell from the sites I listed before, the character was indeed a major character, having appeared in about half of the series/season (Power Rangers: Turbo) he premiered in, and there were several toys of him made for sale in the Western market. I would think that the character having and IMDb page is proof enough that there probably is plenty of independent, third party sourcing, concerning this fictional character.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:06, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
E-Sports Entertainment Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD)) Main reason for deletion was lack of noteworthiness yet a simple search on the subject would reveal mention in numerous publications, particularly an article in the NY Times. Community size was also mentioned but was not even remotely close to being accurate. Also, similar sites in the exact same space are also covered. I brought this up with the admin who processed the deletion, PeterSymonds, who no longer happens to be an admin and recommended I come here. Thunberg (talk) 00:42, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |