Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Index

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Log problem

Hello, in this update the entry for Winestead Drain gives ratings for the template {{Winestead Drain}}. It also fails to list the template as new. Keith D (talk) 11:38, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Another log problem

Hello, in this entry it has added Fountains Fell as been changed from C-class to Unassessed-Class. The talk page of that article has not changed since 6 April 2017. No idea why it has made that entry as still C-class. Keith D (talk) 11:42, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In this entry it has added Happy Valley (TV series) as been changed from C-class to Unassessed-Class. The talk page of that article has not changed since 1 February 2023. It appears to be picking random entries to reassses as that entry is still C-class. Keith D (talk) 12:04, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removing "importance" from a table

When a WikiProject stops tracking "importance" (i.e., {{WikiProject Anarchism}}) what needs to change on the 1.0 bot side so that the table stops generating importance columns in the table? Is it automatic once |importance= is depopulated from all banners? czar 05:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My initial guess would be that you have to delete the "*-Importance anarchism articles" categories, but it looks like you've already done that. I'm not sure the bot has the ability to disregard importance information when it doesn't find those categories, if the importance information existed previously. audiodude (talk) 02:40, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP 1.0 bot not detecting assessment changes

The WP 1.0 bot seems to not be detecting assessment changes in WikiProjects I have been assessing. The table for Crime related articles was last updated on 26 May 2023 at 0:44, while the Crime related log was last updated on the 28th, and does not report any assessments since the 26th. Yet I had already reassessed all 5 articles that are showing as not assessed by the bot before it ran on the 27th, as well as assessing additional articles yesterday and today. I have similar issues with Serial killer-related and Terrorism related article assessments. None of the recent assessments I have made appear to have been detected, yet the bot still appears to be running and dropping older days from the WikiProject logs. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 02:51, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, same issue here: Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Czech Republic articles by quality log. No reassessments on 26 May, and no reports on 27 and 28 May at all. The bot was there, but it just removed the old posts. FromCzech (talk) 05:59, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, sorry about that. The bot is probably stalled. Let me take a look audiodude (talk) 15:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the bot ran on both May 28 and May 29, as evidenced here. Sometimes, the Wikipedia replica databases, that the bot uses to read the status of assessments on Wikipedia, get out of date and are lagging behind the live site. This might be the case now. If the bot tries to update a page and it hasn't changed (from the bot's perspective), it will look like there is no update (because the Mediawiki software detects that there is no actual change and skips the update). Let me check with the WMF cloud folks. audiodude (talk) 15:16, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, from the site that tracks the lag, I can see that it is currently at 129 hours, which would correspond with the delays we're seeing. Unfortunately, when this happens we can only cross our fingers and hope it resolves soon, there's no action we can take from our side. Hope this helps. audiodude (talk) 15:18, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response, audiodude. Guess we will just have to put up with this out of whack issue on en:WP. Ashwin Baindur (User:AshLin) (talk) 15:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 11:03, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]