Jump to content

User talk:GazMan7/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:GazMan7

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Jonteemil (talk | contribs) at 14:23, 5 August 2023 (Renamed file to File:Modified Flag for WikiProject England.jpg: Obvious error. (via WP:JWB)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Archive 1Archive 2

St. Patrick's day

Hi! how are you? You haven't been around much lately, but when you do get this, there is something that appeared on the main article for luton about St. patrick's day. It's good, but it needs discussion about whether we need it or where to place it, etc. I've put it on the talk page, so have a look and discuss. I hope your well, as i've been off due to the snow. I should be on a bit more the coming week, so whatever you need doing, i can do it. I'm starting a few new school articles, so if you don't get this before the end of half term, i should of done one or two articles for the education in luton bit. We may want to add this to the main article, schools in luton that is, under an education heading, but if this won't do anything for the good article status, then forget it. We will need to link it another way. Remember, talk to me on my talk page, as then you'll get my attention. Thanks a lot, Random articles 21:03, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

I've found this interesting link called Irish community in Britain and I reckon it's a good read. Before you read it though, I'll tell you now it doesn't cite it's references, so don't take it as gospel, but it does give this bit of the article a bit more credibility (even if it is a tiny amount). At least if you don't want the celebration bit, we should add this to the demographics bit. What do you think? Random articles 17:49, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Hello?

Whenever you pick this up, you'll see that I've been busy with luton and relating articles. I've added Ashcroft High School to the list and also the town crest to the template. It took a bit of fiddling, but i borrowed some HTML off manchester and that sorted that out. I've closed the discussion on St. Patricks day and I've decided not to include it but add a demographics bit, all referenced up, instead.

I've been browsing many good articles for ideas to improve, and I've seen that a lot of them have a geography and geology bit. Now, I know a bit, but since I've done a lot, and where we are now is all up to your hard work, I'd though I'd query it with you first. It's a good idea, but I wouldn't know where to reference it.

I've found a good few articles that I could start and link back, so improving the link network to luton, getting more people in. I've also been busy doing a little reorganising of the article. I feel there is no flow to the article and it keeps jumping back and forth to different points, so I'm having a go at that too.

I hope your OK, and that you come back soon. I'm a bit stuck for what to do next. Reply to this as soon as you can.

Thanks a lot,

Random articles 19:32, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Morning! I'm up and ready to work. What would you like me to do? Random articles 11:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Point them out to me please, and I'll start to reorganise the article. Random articles 12:46, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Luton

Right, I've come up with a plan of action. There are several things to do before I reckon the article is good article status (possibly featured - you never know):

  • Firstly, we need to reorganise the article. I think that history, followed by politics and demographics should come first. Then education, followed by economics, then transport connections, followed by twin towns, (crap towns), finished by see also and references.
  • We then need to start new sections. Geography and geology should come at the top, before history and after the opening para. Then start a new section called Culture (or something similar - see below). Also add a "see also" bit, linking to other relevant articles.
  • Dismantle the About Luton bit. Sorry, but I think it's too clumsy, and we should merge it with the rest of the article in the relevant places.
  • Culture(?) - this is a good bit, where we can combine all the info about the parks, festivals, local attractions, (crap towns) etc. (again see below (Daughter pages))
  • Daughter pages - these will become increasingly important. I reckon the main article can have a lot of info, but sometimes wanders off (example - history - great, but can wander). I reckon we should set up daughter pages like History of luton, or culture of Luton, or politics in luton etc, so we can expand on these subjects at great length, without cluttering up the main article.
  • Possibly something about the environment. Luton is an industrial town (was), but we don't want to give the impression that we don't care about the environment. There is loads of trees, parks, woods and the river lee to write about, giving a good impression of the town.
  • At some point, I will get a picture (a panorama) of Luton, which I will upload and stick on. this will be, I think, a great addition to the article, giving people a great insight to what luton looks like. (mabye when it's a bit drier, but I will get it).
  • References - I only noticed today that it said on points for improvement that our referencing was incorrectly formatted. I'm guessing this will need to be done at some point, but it looks overly boring to me. I'm not saying you should do it, but there must be something like a bot that can do it for us.

I can see that there are a lot of points, containing a lot of work, but this I think will improve the article no end. I have no problem working on them for the next few days, but I'm back at school next monday, and I shall disappear into a shadow of my current self on Wikipedia. So if we are to do this, we need to start now.

I hope this is OK :)

Random articles 14:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Right, good, we're getting it together now...

  • Geography - I shall have a look around, have a go. I reckon there won't be much to say, but it's important nonetheless. I'll mention the chilterns (the gap we're in, important for transport, chalky/clay etc), Lat/Long, warden hills, (river lee - see below)
  • Culture (I don't like that name - can you think of anything better?) this is basically combining a lot of loose bits of article eg carnival, local attractions, etc and puuting them in a sensible order. We can add as we go along, I'm guessing. mabye combining luton town football, cricket etc (sport) would go down here as well
  • about luton - thank goodness you hate it too. we need to start merging these bits into other parts.
  • Politics - to answer your question, Yes, other good articles and featured articles have daughter pages on politics. mainly because it's a long and not highly interesting to have on the main article :). we can keep what we've got already as this is great (short and to the point), but expand on this daughter page about the town hall, MP's councillors etc. from what I've seen, anything to do with a council goes here.
  • History - this is something I know your interested in and more than happy to let you do it (being useless at history at school). i suggest we create the daughter page, then transfer a lot onto this, and keep the main article short and sweet. i suggest looking through articles such as bristol and Manchester (both GA)
  • Environment - mabye combine this with geography? I'm not saying we should sell the town for a great place, as there are still some grotty establishments across the town, but we do need to mention the abundance of nature in the town.
  • Photos - Great. Upload them into the wikmedia section at this link Wikimedia - Luton, and then other people can get at them. I will have that panorama done soon. (check out sheffield for a good one - FA)
  • References - Uh... well i knew this would have to be done. i don't want to do this as much as you don't (if that makes sense?!) but your right. Split them up and both do them.

I'll try my best to be around next week, but i can't promise anything too concrete. I'll start to set up these pages if your happy with them, then i shall start to transfer and aquire new information, and rewrite what needs to be done.

I've check out MK. It looks good, but we can do better!

OK?

Thanks, Random articles 15:41, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Out of interest, would you like me to start up the daughter pages now, or wait and do something else? Random articles 15:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
I've set up a page on politics, Politics in Luton where you can add your thing that you were going to do on the council. I have also amended the redirect and got a general order. Anything else you know and want to add/change, go right ahead. thanks a lot, Random articles 19:23, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Bad news

I'm afraid that after careful consideration (i.e. my parents told me), i'm going to have to take a wikibreak from next monday onwards until at least May, when my exams are. I will appear sporadically, depending on when I get the time to edit, but I will disappear from monday onwards, to do revision (yeah, right...). However, i've still got till sunday to help, so i will get that panorama done (i hope), i will try to do the daughter pages, set up the culture bit and start on the references.

i will put up a proper wikinotice from today, but i will be around till sunday (i hope)

Sorry about that, Random articles 11:37, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

However, i do not leave with bad news only. i'm currently looking for links with information for the pages. I will leave them on the talk page, eg Talk:Culture in Luton‎ and there will be links, hints and advice to help you along. don;t worry, I'm trying to ease the blow. :)

Random articles 15:46, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

This is Important!

OK, well i've done loads and this might be my last message for some time. I've set up daughter articles on all the relevant aspects in the article and a full list is below. I hope your happy with what i've done, and aware of what lies ahead of you, as it is one hell of a task.

What i have done is this. I have set up the daughter articles, and started most of them off, however, a lot of information, and i mean a lot, needs to be added. On most of them, i have done a lot of the hard work of finding sources by posting them on the talk page. the only one i haven't done this for is transport. I'm much too tired to do it now, mabye tomorrow. I know unfortunately, that prose isn't your thing, but i will try and check up occasionally and help sort a few things out, but no promises though, so don't hold me to it. I have moved information off the main article into the daughter article for most things, but you will have to cut down on the transport bit in the main article, make it flow better and move some of the random facts into the daughter article.

What you really will have to do though urgently is completely re-write the culture bit on the main article. It is dreadful (all my fault by the way) and i'm ashamed of it to be honest. i have left as much info as i can find for the culture daughter article, but there is bound to be more.

Economy, i'm quite proud of. It does need referencing, but the prose is good. In the daughter article, i've found loads of info, so you shouldn't be stuck there and there probably is photos floating around somewhere that you can use (again see below)

History - I've left that honour to you to set up that page as i know that's what your interested in. It shouldn't be too hard, as i've got loads of info already, you just need to supplement it with more general history. Have fun on that!

I've changed a few names of daughter articles so that they tie in with the rest of the articles, and i suggest that you change the formatting on the template to have;

  • About Luton - with all the daughter pages linked
  • Wards - stays the same, just moves down

Scrap amenities as they are contained in culture, and education is on the eductaion in luton bit so leave that out too.

Talking about education, sorry, but production on the secondary school articles is going to slow to a stop. Mabye have a go yourself, but don't fret, they aren't vital to the overall project yet.

One thing I am mightly sorry about is the referencing. I tried, but don't understand what i'm supposed to do, so failed. if i were you, i would leave it right to the end, but try and use the correct referencing when writing new articles, so you (mabye me) won't have to go over it again.

Geography and geology - i've done some, but not a lot. If there's more, then add it, but i have addedd a citation tag to a fact whcih i've always known, but cant prove. you'll see it on the article. one thing you may want to add is a climate bit. i currently don't have the time to do it, but mabye, this would be a good thing to add.

Environmental wise, i suggest merging bits into other parts of the project that are relevant. You were right when you said that NPOV may be violated if we hark on about the environment, but the parks and woodland bit in culture daughter article would be a good place to start to add bits about the environment.

Politics, something i don't like to broach on as general chat :), but the article is set up, and just needs padding out with wahat you wanted to do for the council and the MP's, and it also needs referencing up, but that's not too hard (I think!)

The places in Luton bit seems a bit pointless to me, as we have it at the bottom on the template, so i suggest move it across to the actual list and reformat that to accommodate the list on the main article, then move the main link to somewhere relevant (I dunno, i'm sure you'll know!)

What else? Ah yes, photos. Right, I WILL have that panorama done by some time in the not to distant future, but camera and weather problems have hampered my efforts so far. Other photos, you will have to take yourself, and remember to upload them onto the wikimedia bit for luton. this means that others can use them too, and this means that visitor traffic may go up. I know your not happy with a few, but the ones in the articles at the moment are good, so they probably don't need changing too much.

The layout in the luton main page is fine, so i don't think you need to change it unless something drastic happens. You will notice that on the daughter articles start with something like This article is based around whatever in Luton. This is a good thing to start off with on a new page, so i'd stick with it.

Is this enough? Or do you want more advice? :)

All I can say from here is the best of luck (coz you'll need it!), and that I hope that you won't hate me too much for leaving you such a mammoth task :P Oh and that i hope I'll see you around every once in a while!

Thanks a lot,

Random articles 21:30, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

PS: You may want to start archiving your talk page. It's Reeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaalllllllyyyyy long!

OK, final message (I think). I've added some links to the transport in luton on the talk page. On nearly every article, I've added links to help on the talk page. The only one I haven't is politics, but you'll find everything on the luton.gov site for that. History is all yours, as I've said before and I'm putting below all the pages I've set up and readied for you:

Again, I'm sorry I can't help, but exams are to take precedence over wiki at the moment. You will see me occasionally, in the background, adding a picture or correcting mistakes, etc, but I'm now officially on a wikibreak (if I can manage!)

Well, good luck, and I hope you will do a fantastic job. Use my tips if you want, but completely disregard them as well. Whatever takes your fancy :)

All the best, (and try not to hate me for leaving you with this huge job!)

Random articles 13:12, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Invite

Hello! I thought you may be interested in joining WikiProject England. We work on creating, expanding and making general changes to England related articles. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Project Page!. Thank You.

Hello

Hi! Just popping in to have a look. not much has happened, but i'm not fussed. i see that a wikiproject has been set up, and i've joined, not being an active member at the moment. my revision is going fine and my first exam, art, is next week! (still haven't done enough to get a decent grade!) i don't know exactly when i will be back, but certainly in May as i said on my wikibreak.

i've found some stuf that may interest you. on BBC news, an article [1] has some stuff about luton which is quite good and i'm sure that the company Boddingtons has it's HQ or something important in luton. mabye research that? the panorama i promosed would of been on this week but the weather has taken a turn for the worse and you may still have to wait for it a bit longer.

keep talking to me if you like, but my MSN is still messed up, so no go there. I'll see you around then. Keep going!

Random articles 10:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

That's the Spirit!

Nice additions! You did a good job "wikifying" Luton, Iowa! Chiefsfan364 (talk) 15:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

I almost forgot, Luton in Iowa is a very small town, and there is not much more that can be added on. Chiefsfan364 (talk) 17:05, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

I can try to maybe upload a couple pictures though. Now to just get hold of a digital camera... Chiefsfan364 (talk) 00:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

There. My own personal helicopter took this for me. :) Its a little high up, but what do you think? Chiefsfan364 (talk) 01:19, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

62.215.3.43

I have blocked the user. Please report vandals to WP:AIV instead of creating an article about the IP address. Thank you, Kusma (talk) 13:01, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Oops, i thought i had followed the link correctly but obviously not!!GazMan7 13:49, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Milton Keynes article assessment

If you have time, would you add some notes at talk:Milton Keynes to suggest what needs to be done to reach A class, please? --Concrete Cowboy 13:25, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Automated suggestions for GA article added to MK talk page.

Thanks - A lot to do, I see!
I think that I've seen these before when I put up History of Milton Keynes for peer review, changed as far as I could tell but didn't know how to submit for checking again. Is the javascript tester generally available? If so, could you tell me where to find it? If not, then out of curiousity could you spare the time to run it against History of MK to see how close I got, please? (I was trying hard to reach GA for the 40th birthday on 15 Jan 2007 - that's passed now though there will be events all through the year.) --Concrete Cowboy 00:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thanks - happy to do it myself, if I understood the instructions? What's my "monobook" and how do I add the script to it? --Concrete Cowboy 13:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Sorry if I'm being dense, but I've done as suggested (and gone back to user talk:AndyZ to be sure I have the orginal. I've even installed firefox in case it is an IE funny. But no sign of an extra tab [I'm expecting to find it beside
article | discussion | edit | + | history | move | watch | . Suggestions? --Concrete Cowboy 16:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Ok, I've got it! Tks. --Concrete Cowboy 15:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Sign your comments

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! John Reaves (talk) 15:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)


oops - yes sorry missed oneGazMan7 15:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Ta

Thanks for the talk page revert, GazMan! :) – Riana ঋ 14:38, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Source

I have the source, right here: 

 growabrain.typepad.com/growabrain/iowa.jpg

Chiefsfan364 (talk) 14:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

// Script from User:AndyZ/peerreviewer.js importScript('User:AndyZ/peerreviewer.js'); //User:AndyZ/peerreviewer.js

Wow.

Issuing a {{test1}} for an edit like this is a bit of an understatement don't you reckon? It's also a waste of time because Byrnesfan2 (talk • contribs) is obviously a sockpuppet trying to annoy an administrator. Send it straight to WP:AIV next time. Don't even bother issuing warnings. --  Netsnipe  ►  16:26, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Newpages

wikiproject beds

hi there, at the moment no, i'm not interested as i've got an art exam tomorrow and the rest of the in 32 school days, but afterwards, yes, i would be happy to help. the luton article looks like not much is happening, but i'm seeing that you're busy elsewhere. Don't worry, it'll be done in time, i hope :)

see you around then

Random articles 08:50, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

James howard holmes

Hi there; two points about this article, which you {{speedy}} tagged. Firstly, {{db-not notable}} is not a recognised speedy deletion category. Please look at WP:CSD. Secondly, I would sumbit that a United States Ambassador is notable. I have removed the tag.--Anthony.bradbury 16:51, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits to Marius misiunas

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, GazMan7! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule img[0-9]+\.imageshack\.us\/my\.php\?image\=.*\.(jpg|jpeg|gif|png|svg), is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 10:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Marius misiunas

Hi there; I have changed your tag on this article. Wiki policy is to allow a short period of time for editors to translate their foreign-language submissions. I have asked the editor to do so; the page will delete if he does not.--Anthony.bradbury 12:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Sara Seager

You tagged this page as a CSD. I really don't think it qualifies --Darksun 15:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


Zippynate

Thats fine, I was gonna delete it myself, was feeling bored, so decided to see what I could do on Wiki. --Zippynate 16:41, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Postal(band)

It was a weird sense of deja vu... I deleted this earlier today so this was a recreation. salted now...--Isotope23 19:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your user page

Hi, I noted you have a quick link on your talk page to Template:TestTemplates, but they are deprecated. The latest fashion is Wikipedia:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace. Just thought this could be of interest for you. Fighting of the urge to edit another users user page, here :-) Greswik 17:55, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

LogoWorks

I've added additional references as well as some more information about the company (including criticisms). I have a particular interest in adding missing pages for notable startups, but could use some advice on how to approach it... I've been looking at other company pages which have not been tagged for notability and/or advertising and trying to model my articles on that. Any other advice? If the logoworks article looks ok, could you remove the tags and/or help? Thanks Violethughes 16:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi There!

Hi, hope things are well on your end. School's a nightmare at the moment with exams on the door (2 weeks!), but i've noticed a few, lets say, unhappy people concerning the article. If they want to rant, up to them, but i suggest you develop those sections slightly just into something with a bit more depth to stop them wasting space on the talk page.

I've been busy with a camera and got some photos, but they will be a little while longer i'm afraid, and there have been some calls to delete some articles linking to luton.(try the urban area one) Please have a look and try to add something,as they are relevent, but there are some who are concerned with notability than relevant info. Oh, and check that picture on the urban area. i think i shaded in the wrong area!

Speak again soon, Random articles 14:25, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

do i mistake?

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Atifzain&redirect=no

Hi tell me what i did wrong with Atif and if i then what will be the effect? are you a authority person to warn me. i am a new bie here. kindly guide me. Thanks ATIF ZAIN —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Atifzain (talk • contribs) 07:44, 4 May 2007 (UTC).

Luton history

Hi GazMan,

Thanks for your message about Bury Park.

I don't have a great supply of information about the history of Luton: I got the information by going to the local history section of Dunstable Library and looking up Bury Park in the index of each book about Luton. Doing this is quite slow, and it seems there is not a lot of information to find. (There is a DVD for sale in some shops in Luton called The Story of Luton, and I know the director says not much is recorded about the recent history of the town because it has been too busy with redevelopments that make money.) I will continue to see what I can add; for example about the early history of the hamlets of Biscot and Limbury.

I prefer to work away quietly in the background, so I don't make many comments. But you may like to know that I have noticed the good work done by you, and by Random articles, expanding and structuring the Luton articles and countering some people's extreme negative views! JonH 17:12, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

209.201.26.7

Thought you might like to know 209.201.26.7 has vandalised Edmund Tylney, as you warned he would be blocked if he continued after vandalising Sam Neil --OrangeDog 17:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Big_Brother_2007_%28UK%29&diff=131918568&oldid=131896957

morning glory

Slang belongs to wiktionary. The disambiguation page has link to wiktionary article. `'Miikka 15:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:LutonCrest.jpg

While the Arms of the borough of Luton are in the public domain, specific renderings of the arms/crest attract copyright and will not definitely be in the public domain until 70 years after the artist's death.

Image:LutonCrest.jpg appears to be from the International Civic Heraldry site (I assume that is where you found it). That website asserts copyright, and unless you can verify a different source, which asserts that the creator died before 1937 (or that the image has been released or licensed acceptably), the image must be listed as non-free and used in accordance with the policy on non-free content. I have added the source to the image's description page and removed it from {{Luton}} again, per WP:NFCC#9. I have also tagged the image as being in need of a fair use rationale. — mholland (talk) 22:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Hey!

thanks for the message, yeah my exams went great, got top marks in most my exams ( A*'s all round ) i'm in sixth form now, and i reckon i'll start getting back online soon, so cya around :) RA Random articles 11:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

sure, get me at XXX@hotmail.com (plus i'd like it if ya get rid of this after its in your msn, so i don't get spam or whatever) RA Random articles 15:25, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Please contact me for a proposal

Hi there, I would very much like to talk to you. I'm in Bedfordshire also and have a proposal, please call/txt me on this number (or drop call and I will call you back) number is here. Cheers, Paul —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.105.14.60 (talk) 04:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

He doesn't live in Bedfordshire. It's most likely a scam. I am contacting an admin about it, friend. ScarianTalk 08:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
The statement above is false as I have shown twice already to be the case. Why does the trigger happy mod undoing my revisions not show the truth about the situation? I live in Bedford Puttenhoe wiki 03:27, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
i'm intrigued, but i do know better. keep me updated on this if you don't mind, thanks Random articles 08:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Pictures

I've uploaded some photos for the Dunstable page and Ashton School page, I will probably take more in Luton soon, are there any places in particular you wanted photographed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by DearCatastropheWaitress (talk • contribs) 18:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Luton6thlogo.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Luton6thlogo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Snowman (talk) 22:18, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Luton6thlogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Luton6thlogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 03:18, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Colworth

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Colworth, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Colworth. Chris Jefferies (talk) 23:32, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GazMan7/Archive_2&oldid=1168859273"