Talk:Two by Twos

Edits removed 24 Feb 2019

I've removed these edits which were summarized with...

I removed the erroneous statement that "members are told to deny any church name" and gave one explanation for why any name(s) exist at all. Also, removed the word "only" in "salvation is only available" because that is flatly not the case. God saves whomever He saves. It is true where the gospel has been preached, those who reject it may miss out. But what most ministers would say is that such matters are in God's hand. It is possible to accept every word preached and nevertheless "lose out."

Please note that article lead sections are used to summarize the referenced material in an article's body. Personal experience and research is not suitable for inclusion in articles, and instead the material in articles are to be referenced to published source materials. If you wish to add material with alternative viewpoints, please do so within the body of the article (not simply alter the lead section) with reliable references to back up your statements. • Astynax ^talk 21:15, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Sounds like you removed edits /info that was correct 134.215.4.36 (talk) 19:37, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Edits removed 30 Jul 2021

I've removed these edits for the reasons given below...

• The change to "one of the labels used to denote a nameless international, home-based new religious movement" in the article lead section does not reflect the body of the article in which are given many names under which the group is known, including several official names taken by the church's leadership over the years.
• The change to "current iteration of the church is believed to have been" in the article's lead does not reflect the body of the article which shows this church having been founded by William Irvine. There are no previous iterations.
• The change to "holds annual regional conventions and weekly public Gospel meetings in hired venues" in the article's lead section is not completely accurate. In few, if any, fields are Gospel meetings held on a regular weekly basis, and not all Gospel meetings are held in hired venues.
• The change of "later secretiveness" to "recent times" in the article body plays down the secretive nature that developed and which has been repeatedly noted in reliable sources.

The edits did point out some awkward phrasing, which I've amended and for which I thank you. • Astynax ^talk 00:54, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Sexual Assault in the Church

I was raised in this religion. I never believed in it but I would like to know more about it. I saw in the publication that there was mention of sexual assault, I would like to more about this subject. I'm interested in learning more truth about the religion it almost feels like there is a secret part missing. Finding out more about there money trail would be quite interesting. I also know they still practice meetings in places like parks and such where only certain religions are allowed. (As to keep there practice secret from governments/law enforcement) I wonder if there is somebody above the head workers, I wanna know who's at the very top. I have heard stories of the female workers being sexually assaulted by other male workers. I also would like to bring up the complete sexist way that they will only allow male workers to be head workers. What are they trying to keep so secret? Why don't they tell members more about how it was founded. I was always under the impression that the religion had always been because nothing was even explained. This article is great but I wouldn't say that it quite up to date with how they act now. Many members use technology, even the workers have phones and social media. But don't get the wrong idea the people are super nice probably some of the nicest people I've met. And I know of members who do have tattoos. I did notice that almost all members hide the fact that they take part in "worldly" things like watching TV. I also noticed that it's not mentioned in the article that workers go around to the different members house and stay the night with them or even multiple nights. They are also given there vehicles by members of the church along with there gas money ECT. Currently I haven't meet a bad person belonging to the church, they all seem like good people but I would like for the church to be more transparent to it's members. I would be very interested in anything else that has been heard or seen that hasn't already been mentioned. 2600:387:F:E37:0:0:0:2 (talk) 08:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

The main problem for under-reported groups such as the Two by Twos is finding published source reference material required to support statements added to articles. There have been several court cases, some ongoing, and convictions of such incidents which could be added to this article (with appropriate references). However, it likely would not be acceptable to add language to imply that sexual predation was a widespread or inherent characteristic within this group unless backed up with high-level source material. • Astynax ^talk 17:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

The latest episode (published Aug. 16, 2023) of the "Trust Me: Cults, Extreme Belief, and Manipulation" podcast is part one of a discussion with two former members; one of the podcast hosts is a former member from a different area. At least one mentions having been a fourth-generation member. They finish the episode by reading a letter to the community from a member of leadership about the sexual abuse by a recently dead member, I think an overseer.

https://www.trustmepod.com/podcast/episode/4c0d7990/kyle-and-kari-part-1-deconstructing-the-two-by-twos Ann Burlingham (talk) 00:14, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

I don't question the seriousness of this issue, however, until there is coverage of this issue in WP:RS reliable sources (e.g., scholarly journals/books, mainstream newspapers/broadcast news, and similar published sources) this subject won't meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. Podcasts generally don't meet the standards, unless associated with scholarship (such as produced by a sociologist of note), and often not even then if the content primarily reflects opinion or personal viewpoints rather than research. This and similar issues (such as financial details) are certainly worthy of inclusion; once backed by acceptable sources. • Astynax ^talk 15:17, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Citations in lead

There's not one single citation in the lead and this is highly problematic. This article needs massive improvements to the lead. AlanS^talk 05:00, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi @AlanS. According to WP:LEADCITE, citations are not absolutely required in the lead, assuming that all the information in the lead is presented with citations in the body of the article. However, if there are controversial statements in the lead, then citations should be duplicated there. Is there anything in particular in the lead for which citations are not provided in the body, or anything that you think is controversial? Indyguy (talk) 15:05, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

@Indyguy "These organization names are used only for registration purposes and are not used by members." I'd think that is a strong enough of a statement that it should have an inline cite. Organisations handling finances need to have some sort of registration in a lot of jurisdictions, whether unincorporated or incorporated. If there is some sort of strong claim otherwise that should be backed up. AlanS^talk 22:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

One could purport just about any statement out to be "controversial" with this group, as (based upon my reading) many members deny it is an "organization" at all. That the official names were taken by the group's clergy and/or upper echelons of its membership, rather being imposed by outsiders, is incontrovertible (they've signed the documents), and that the common names are used, even if by outsiders, is widely supported by reliable sources. I personally fail to understand how this would confuse readers, nor how repeating citations in the lead would be an improvement. • Astynax ^talk 17:25, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

It's clearly an organisation, regardless its views. It has rigid, long-standing in-group and out-group rules, a defining characteristic of organisation. It considers all other Christians to not be Christians unless they are specifically baptised by its ministers and attend its services to the exclusion of others. It has specific social norms that its members strictly adhere to. AlanS^talk 06:46, 28 June 2023 (UTC)