Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thurmaston Shopping Centre (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Thurmaston. Black Kite (talk) 09:57, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thurmaston Shopping Centre

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small shopping centre with no indication of WP:notability. The only relevant reference is to a small local paper story. Other refs are either to the developer or the store that existed on this site before. This was previously nominated and userfied. As it has been put back in main space with no substantial changes, nominating again. noq (talk) 14:15, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom fails WP:GNG. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 14:38, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and Davey. Wikipedia is not a retail guide.--Charles (talk) 17:18, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Thurmaston#Facilities, as it's probably important to the local area but lacks the sources that would be needed for a separate article. This has been moved to user space and back twice without improvement; if done again the discussion should be allowed to reach a conclusion. Peter James (talk) 21:46, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Thurmaston -- we do not allow articles on shopping malls, except the very largest. Peterkingiron (talk) 12:47, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 04:31, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge selectively to Thurmaston. There's very little here work keeping but a little more detail in the Thurmaston article wouldn't hurt. --Michig (talk) 10:44, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge to Thurmaston - Looks more like a directory than anything else. aycliffe^talk 08:48, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.