Talk:Nibiru cataclysm

Nibiru cataclysm has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 12, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
June 23, 2009	Good article nominee	Not listed
August 29, 2009	Good article nominee	Not listed
September 28, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
August 7, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
April 3, 2018	Peer review	Reviewed
January 30, 2019	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
Current status: Good article

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Paranormal GA‑class Mid‑importance

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Alternative Views GA‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Skepticism GA‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Astronomy GA‑class Bottom‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Bottom	This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

Govert Schilling

I have removed (from the lede) a citation which failed verification of what is claimed in the sentence. In fact, here you can see it appears he is saying quite the opposite.Wjhonson (talk) 18:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.infona.pl/resource/bwmeta1.element.springer-3591af55-c6e0-313d-8033-636127b1c6ae

Pole Shift

I have removed the parenthetical clause "a physical pole shift..." because I read the underlying linked source and she does not state this.Wjhonson (talk) 19:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bbc article

according to the bbc there is a hidden planet in the solar system, the section on conspiracy theory needs to be removed in light of this new information.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/66727365 82.9.56.21 (talk) 20:15, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]