Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Appearing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Jonesey95 (talk | contribs) at 17:59, 30 October 2023 (Fix Linter errors. More needed. Leaving obsolete tags for bots.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Joyous! | Talk 00:46, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Appearing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References to Moviefone and Rotten Tomatoes do not constitute reliable secondary independent coverage. No evidence of real world notability. KDS4444 (talk) 12:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:12, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strike that. Dread Central is apparently one of those outlets. Do they know their website is compromised? There's a sneaky script that links to a spamring if you click the header while it's still loading. -Jergling PC Load Letter 19:24, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind the nevermind. See below. -Jergling PC Load Letter 19:31, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Dread Central appears to be a spamblog, based on the procedural nature of those articles, the 0 comments on every article, the >50,000 Alexa rank, and the fact that every page has a malicious script that opens "findbetterresults.com" upon clicking random links. -Jergling PC Load Letter 19:31, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:18, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.