Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JQT (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No commenters actually explained a policy-based rationale for their view regarding notability. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

JQT (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Band was active for short period of time, no longer active, and an insignificant band, article will not be updated due to bands inactiveness Emzidrama (talk) 12:40, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:26, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:26, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - the subject is notable, but as you said, it will stop being interesting. Karlhard ^{(talk to me)} 00:52, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 06:17, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.