User talk:KennySJT
Welcome
|
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, KennySJT. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, KennySJT. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, KennySJT. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Women's Camanachd Association Challenge Cup (September 29)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/AFC-Logo_Decline.svg/50px-AFC-Logo_Decline.svg.png)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Women's Camanachd Association Challenge Cup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Women's Camanachd Association Challenge Cup, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
![]() |
Hello, KennySJT!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 16:05, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
|
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Your submission at Articles for creation: Women's Camanachd Association Challenge Cup has been accepted
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Theroadislong (talk) 20:30, 22 April 2020 (UTC)ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
November 2023
![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/Stop_x_nuvola.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|she) 00:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)To add, even if you are not a white nationalist, your on-wiki self-designation as an ethno-nationalist (which in the context of white Brits is the same thing) would be sufficient basis to block for disruptive editing, for the reasons given above. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|she) 01:00, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/Appointment_blue.svg/48px-Appointment_blue.svg.png)
KennySJT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have not been quoted as supporting “white nationalism”, “fascism” or “neo-nazism”. None of these sources are on the perennial sources list so the reliability must be properly judged. UK newspapers, and in particular Scottish papers are very tabloid; they throw terms around and don’t often give people a chance to respond, they use anonymous and biased souces, they are not very reliable. I have disputed these terms in the papers many times.
“White-nationalism” is very American, due to a complex history of immigration, racialisation and strife. The UK press have taken to using it because of it’s negative connotations. “Ethno-nationalism” relates to a persons ethnicity & heritage and has a different origin, as explained by wikipedia’s own article. They are not the same, if they were they would be in the same wikipedia article. Britain is made of 3 nations, the English, the Scottish and the Welsh, as explained by wiki’s own articles on these ethnicities. Therefore, I’m not sure the comment “which in the context of white Brits is the same thing” is accurate or fair.
The article on ethno-nationalism is not very detailed. The article on nationalism is, and includes ethno-nationalism, so I felt it encompased my views better. I did not intend to cause confusion.
I was merely attempting to ensure accurate terms are used. KennySJT (talk) 02:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I read the BLP article and believed I could remove contentious material that is unsourced or poorly sourced with my own user. I had not seen the conflict of interest page before, and now see i should have handled it differently; it's not something I would repeat. I have not been quoted as supporting “white nationalism”, “fascism” or “neo-nazism”. None of these sources are on the perennial sources list so the reliability must be properly judged. UK newspapers, and in particular Scottish papers are very tabloid; they throw terms around and don’t often give people a chance to respond, they use anonymous and biased souces, they are not very reliable. I have disputed these terms in the papers many times. “White-nationalism” is very American, due to a complex history of immigration, racialisation and strife. The UK press have taken to using it because of it’s negative connotations. “Ethno-nationalism” relates to a persons ethnicity & heritage and has a different origin, as explained by wikipedia’s own article. They are not the same, if they were they would be in the same wikipedia article. Britain is made of 3 nations, the English, the Scottish and the Welsh, as explained by wiki’s own articles on these ethnicities. Therefore, I’m not sure the comment “which in the context of white Brits is the same thing” is accurate or fair. The article on ethno-nationalism is not very detailed. The article on nationalism is, and includes ethno-nationalism, so I felt it encompased my views better. I did not intend to cause confusion. I was merely attempting to ensure accurate terms are used. [[User:KennySJT|KennySJT]] ([[User talk:KennySJT#top|talk]]) 02:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I read the BLP article and believed I could remove contentious material that is unsourced or poorly sourced with my own user. I had not seen the conflict of interest page before, and now see i should have handled it differently; it's not something I would repeat. I have not been quoted as supporting “white nationalism”, “fascism” or “neo-nazism”. None of these sources are on the perennial sources list so the reliability must be properly judged. UK newspapers, and in particular Scottish papers are very tabloid; they throw terms around and don’t often give people a chance to respond, they use anonymous and biased souces, they are not very reliable. I have disputed these terms in the papers many times. “White-nationalism” is very American, due to a complex history of immigration, racialisation and strife. The UK press have taken to using it because of it’s negative connotations. “Ethno-nationalism” relates to a persons ethnicity & heritage and has a different origin, as explained by wikipedia’s own article. They are not the same, if they were they would be in the same wikipedia article. Britain is made of 3 nations, the English, the Scottish and the Welsh, as explained by wiki’s own articles on these ethnicities. Therefore, I’m not sure the comment “which in the context of white Brits is the same thing” is accurate or fair. The article on ethno-nationalism is not very detailed. The article on nationalism is, and includes ethno-nationalism, so I felt it encompased my views better. I did not intend to cause confusion. I was merely attempting to ensure accurate terms are used. [[User:KennySJT|KennySJT]] ([[User talk:KennySJT#top|talk]]) 02:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I read the BLP article and believed I could remove contentious material that is unsourced or poorly sourced with my own user. I had not seen the conflict of interest page before, and now see i should have handled it differently; it's not something I would repeat. I have not been quoted as supporting “white nationalism”, “fascism” or “neo-nazism”. None of these sources are on the perennial sources list so the reliability must be properly judged. UK newspapers, and in particular Scottish papers are very tabloid; they throw terms around and don’t often give people a chance to respond, they use anonymous and biased souces, they are not very reliable. I have disputed these terms in the papers many times. “White-nationalism” is very American, due to a complex history of immigration, racialisation and strife. The UK press have taken to using it because of it’s negative connotations. “Ethno-nationalism” relates to a persons ethnicity & heritage and has a different origin, as explained by wikipedia’s own article. They are not the same, if they were they would be in the same wikipedia article. Britain is made of 3 nations, the English, the Scottish and the Welsh, as explained by wiki’s own articles on these ethnicities. Therefore, I’m not sure the comment “which in the context of white Brits is the same thing” is accurate or fair. The article on ethno-nationalism is not very detailed. The article on nationalism is, and includes ethno-nationalism, so I felt it encompased my views better. I did not intend to cause confusion. I was merely attempting to ensure accurate terms are used. [[User:KennySJT|KennySJT]] ([[User talk:KennySJT#top|talk]]) 02:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}