User talk:Rawna Praveen singh solanki
December 2022
Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ravana Rajputs without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 12:50, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ravana Rajputs, you may be blocked from editing. Please use accurate edit summaries. Making large, controversial content changes without consensus is disruptive, and you appear to be edit warring. Stop. Zinnober9 (talk) 10:23, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Major Thakur Dalpat Singh
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Major Thakur Dalpat Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. EnormityOP (talk) 03:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
June 2023
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ravana Rajputs, you may be blocked from editing.
Please do not upload copyright images and claim them as your "own work" - Arjayay (talk) 13:48, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- It's may copy right but it's related to ravana rajput. That is it. Thank you Rawna Praveen singh solanki (talk) 11:05, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
September 2023
Your edit to Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. While you did credit the Times of India, the content is still under copyright. If you obtained special permission from the publication, please make a note of it on the talk page. Enrico (talk) 19:18, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello. Your recent edit to Ravana Rajputs appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ravana Rajputs, you may be blocked from editing.
Please do not try to use predatory open access journals as references - Arjayay (talk) 18:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Ravana Rajputs
Hello. Your recent edit to Ravana Rajputs appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Kanha Singh and Vel Singh moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Kanha Singh and Vel Singh. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 14:26, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
November 2023
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Dewal Pratiharas. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Isaidnoway (talk) 🍁 10:09, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 22:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
{{User:fancy vibēs who is playing with Indian History}}
Dear seniors User:Packer&Tracker,User:DreamRimmer,User:Tamzin,User:ToBeFree, User:Sitush I need your attention and help.
The User:fancy vibēs damage many pages by removing content, source and refference from pages like Dewal Pratiharas,Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty, Dalpat Singh (soldier),Thakur Hari Singh, Kana vela (specially he removed Rajput and Ravana Rajputs from those pages and playing with history by using his good skill of wikipedia editing like using Wikipedia:Reliable sources, Wikipedia:UNSOURCED,Wikipedia:Unusual articles etc.., to make people fool).
1.He Vandalism me without any notice and message in my Talk page for my last edit on Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty but my edit was verifiable and releted to the article. My last edit was a word Parihar.The parihar was aslo used for Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty the refference was ([1] Here) . This user also damage Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty page by removed the descents likePratihara rulers of Nagod, Dewal Pratiharas and many more for this I left message and notice on User:Fancy vibēs(talk page) by using those notice he complete about me on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and I was blocked in charge of Disruptive edit.He add a caste his Gurjar on the Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty but the page under protection for CASTE for this of kind disputes the ancestors of this dynasty also filled case Indian High Court for gurjar fake clim of Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty the refference for this is here (https://www.outlookindia.com/website/story/india-news-stop-distortion-of-rajput-history-king-mihir-bhojs-descendent-to-modi-govt/395870), (https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/voices/emperor-mihirbhoj-pratihar-saving-his-legacy-from-vote-bank-politics/).
2.The User:Fancy vibēs also damage and nominated the deletion of page Dewal Pratiharas by first removing all refference from page and in discussion of nomination he questioned that there was not any refference that states that Dewal Pratiharasare Rajput to delete this page but they were Rajputs the refference was here[2] which by this user in from page.
3.This User:Fancy vibēs also removed list of Notable people from Ravana Rajputs by removing Ravana Rajputs from Pages like Dalpat Singh (soldier), Thakur Hari Singh(Father of Dalpat Singh (soldier)). The reference in Dalpat Singh (soldier) states that his was from Ravana Rajputs caste the reference was (here[3]).
4.This User:Fancy vibēs created many accounts by same name Parmar like Parmar (Jat clan),Parmar Nagar, Parmar, Himachal Pradesh and renamed Parmar to Parmar (Rajput clan).
4.1.Parmar (Rajput clan) was rename by User:Fancy vibēs but there was not any single word of Rajput in content, source and refference. He renamed just because to make people fool.
5.Fake history of Hun clan and thier sub-clan. The User:Fancy vibēs wright fake History of Hun clan by using Chalukya dynasty Pulakeshin II but there was not any statement reference that say Pulakeshin II was from Hun clan or gurjar-mixter. The reference of Hun clan was (here ) .
Please take some action on this user. Thank you Rawna Praveen singh solanki (talk) 09:16, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Rawna Praveen singh solanki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 09:35, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{Help}}
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Rawna Praveen singh solanki (talk) 09:39, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
You need to say what help you want or need when using the templates. Cabayi (talk) 09:45, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- (ec) Help requests are unnecessary(and if done, should not be placed in the section header). You may make a new unblock request for someone else to review, in which you do as I've said above. See the unblock appeals guide for more information. 331dot (talk) 09:46, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- @331dot@Cabayi
==
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/Appointment_blue.svg/48px-Appointment_blue.svg.png)
Rawna Praveen singh solanki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Change
{{unblock}}
to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
==
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Rawna Praveen singh solanki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The User:Fancy vibēs damage many pages by removed content,source and refference from pages like Dewal Pratiharas,Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty, Dalpat Singh (soldier), Thakur Hari Singh,Kana vela (specially he removed Rajput and Ravana Rajputs from those pages to make people fool) .
- 1.He Vandalism on Wikipedia me without any notice and message on my talk page. He vandalism for my last edit on Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty which is verifiable and releted to the article. My last edit was a word Parihar the word was also used for Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty the refference for this was (here[4]). This user aslo damage Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty by removing the descents like Parihar|pratihar ruler of Nagod, Dewal Pratiharas and many more from this. So i left messages and notice on User:Fancy vibēs (talk page) by using those notice he complete about me in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and I was blocked in the charge of Dispurtive edit . Please unblock me to make my mistake correct and prove myself Right. Thank You.
Decline reason:
No, you will not be unblocked to "make your mistake correct" nor to "prove yourself right". --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 03:02, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Rawna Praveen singh solanki (talk) 12:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi, you'll need to remove the "nowiki" tags around the unblock request template to place it correctly. Regards, — AP 499D25 (talk) 00:07, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your suggestion and and attention. Thank you♥️ Rawna Praveen singh solanki (talk) 01:57, 10 November 2023 (UTC)