Jump to content

Talk:Landspout

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 15:26, 10 January 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Weather}}, {{WikiProject Physics}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Image request

[edit]

An airflow diagram describing structure and/or formation would be very helpful. -- Beland 00:41, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Terms

[edit]

A few handy references for terms are:

Evolauxia 01:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Examples: http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/slc/climate/tornado.php

Are landspouts in some films?

[edit]

Looking at pictures I think there are several landspouts in The Day After Tomorrow when Los Angeles is destroyed. When that guy in the skycraper building rings his friend and tells him a tornado warning has been issued to the Los Angeles area, his friend goes outside and sees what looks like to me a landspout. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phthinosuchusisanancestor (talkcontribs) 10:18, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Day After Tomorrow is a scientific travesty, and even if it were relevant I would not want to include it here. (sorry, I find it hard to hide my disdain for bad science :-D) -RunningOnBrains(talk page) 16:38, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know of any films that went out of their way to create landspouts, however I do know they were mentioned in a Criminal Minds episode. BusyWikipedian (talk) 00:55, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mis-Dated Photograph

[edit]

1924? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.75.157.94 (talk) 22:01, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Landspout. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

That's not what is for. Someone comes to the article "Landspout", they don't think they're coming to the article "waterspout". The first paragraph links to waterspout if they're curious. What possible benefit is there to this hatnote? What problem is it trying to solve? --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:42, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]