Talk:Zhang Zhongjing

This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge Zhang Ji (Chinese physician)

Merge: This page was changed to a redirecting page without discussion. I reverted and ask for discussion for the merge issue. This person is more commonly referred to as Zhang Zhongjing, not Zhang Ji. According to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names), Zhang Zhongjing should be the title of the article. Furthermore, Zhang Zhongjing has a much longer edit history than Zhang Ji (Chinese physician). --Neo-Jay 20:16, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have no objection to doing the merge the other way - but please, don't retain two different articles about the same person under different names. Mike Serfas 00:03, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have merged these articles. --Neo-Jay 04:32, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs more sources

Article currently relies on only one major source. That source is the best book in English on the subject at this time, but we should have more. I will find some more reliable secondary sources.