Talk:Bashar al-Assad
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bashar al-Assad article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article Bashar al-Assad, along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 3 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 8 sections are present. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Correction:
Assad is not Regional Secretary any longer. The post was abolished in 2018. His title is "General Secretary of the Central Leadership of the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party" https://syrianobserver.com/EN/news/46525/ruling_baath_party_rearranges_its_structure.html
The post of Regional Secretary of the Regional Command was abolished and the Regional Command and the National Command were merged together if I remember correctly--84.212.173.160 (talk) 19:21, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Why official, "nice", smiling pictures?
Continuing his personality cult on WP? Or is his secret police sanitising this article? Shameless. Arminden (talk) 09:09, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- Arminden], under WP:NPOV, the photos and information we add to articles should be neutral in nature. While he has many sides, the article should present information accurately and not be biased in either direction. Jurisdicta (talk) 00:16, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Jurisdicta: No, that’s not what WP:NPOV says at all. The information we present most definitely must be “biased” in a particular direction if to do so reflects the way the subject is presented in the sources. In the words of the policy, we must “fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources”. The Adolf Hitler article is “not biased in either direction”? AH is described in that article as the embodiment of evil. As far as the picture is concerned, the main aim is to be present a high quality (in a technical sense) image of him which is representative. The current pic is good quality - should he be smiling? I agree that’s slightly inappropriate - if a different pic can be found which is of equal quality then that would be better. But to be honest, it’s quite a minor issue. I don’t think that pic represents “continuing his personality cult”. DeCausa (talk) 08:37, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- While I see your point DeCausa, WP:NPOV clearly states "which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias." If we cite to an article that is from a reliable source and there is a fair amount of editorial bias, it should not be included. I agree with you, both sides of an issue should be presented if there is a legitimate dispute, but one side should not be dominate in an article if disputed. An example would be an op-ed from a reliable source. One could argue that what is being stated conforms accurately to the op-ed from a reliable source, but if it is biased, the bias outweighs the source. I believe there is a difference between bias and historically accurate. If history or facts presented are accurate and not disputed, it can paint a less than flattering picture of an individual. Jurisdicta (talk) 02:44, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- no, that’s still not it. It’s not for us to judge whether a reliable source is biased per se, although it may come into whether a source is WP:RS or not. The bare statement that we can’t use a reliable source because an individual editor thinks it’s biased is absolutely wrong. And also, it’s not a case of “both sides being presented if there’s a legitimate dispute”. Take this article, if the preponderance of WP:RS treat Assad as a saint that’s how he should be presented here. If the preponderance treats him as a bloodthirsty mass murderer, then that’s how we present him. It’s not for us to decide the “truth” and it’s not about “historical fact”, - “facts” can always be found to prove almost anything. The issue of difficulty in wikipedia is (a) when there’s a variety of views in the RS and how that should be presented (i.e. the preponderance is debatable) and (b) what to do with a minority view that’s not so much of a minority as to constitute WP:FRINGE. DeCausa (talk) 07:26, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- While I see your point DeCausa, WP:NPOV clearly states "which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias." If we cite to an article that is from a reliable source and there is a fair amount of editorial bias, it should not be included. I agree with you, both sides of an issue should be presented if there is a legitimate dispute, but one side should not be dominate in an article if disputed. An example would be an op-ed from a reliable source. One could argue that what is being stated conforms accurately to the op-ed from a reliable source, but if it is biased, the bias outweighs the source. I believe there is a difference between bias and historically accurate. If history or facts presented are accurate and not disputed, it can paint a less than flattering picture of an individual. Jurisdicta (talk) 02:44, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Jurisdicta: No, that’s not what WP:NPOV says at all. The information we present most definitely must be “biased” in a particular direction if to do so reflects the way the subject is presented in the sources. In the words of the policy, we must “fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources”. The Adolf Hitler article is “not biased in either direction”? AH is described in that article as the embodiment of evil. As far as the picture is concerned, the main aim is to be present a high quality (in a technical sense) image of him which is representative. The current pic is good quality - should he be smiling? I agree that’s slightly inappropriate - if a different pic can be found which is of equal quality then that would be better. But to be honest, it’s quite a minor issue. I don’t think that pic represents “continuing his personality cult”. DeCausa (talk) 08:37, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 20 August 2021
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
add bashar al assad signature: file:Bashar Hafez al-Assad Signature.png Asd3131 (talk) 20:27, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:37, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
"Assaded" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Assaded and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 9#Assaded until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Alawite = shia
I cannot clarify that bashar al assad is a shia muslim. Based on search on page typing, there is only mentions for 2 words which are called shia.2404:8000:1027:85F6:C83E:347B:474F:A63E (talk) 09:32, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- The article makes the sourced statement that he is an "Alawite Muslim", with a wikilink to the Alawite article as to what that means and its relationship to Shia Islam. DeCausa (talk) 09:42, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:38, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
is he a politician???
Why is this dictator even called "politician"? Was he elected? Was the election free and fair? Dear wikipedia, why don't you refer hitler, stalin or mao as a "politician"? I mean the "d-word" is so rude... 92.249.214.251 (talk) 13:03, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- his dad was made leader by a military coup and since bashar came to power if you talked ONE WORD bad about him, your children will get poisoned and you will never see their face again, and you would be killed or forced in the army. 2001:1970:55E8:7F00:60F6:D4AD:9672:10DE (talk) 19:41, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- These are the opening sentence of the Wikipedia articles on Hitler, Stalin and Mao:
- "Adolf Hitler (German: [ˈaːdɔlf ˈhɪtlɐ] ; 20 April 1889 – 30 April 1945) was an Austrian-born German politician..."
- Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin (born Ioseb Besarionis dze Jughashvili; 18 December [O.S. 6 December] 1878 – 5 March 1953) was a Soviet politician..."
- Mao Zedong (26 December 1893 – 9 September 1976) was a Chinese politician..."
- What's your point? DeCausa (talk) 20:50, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Kidnapping of 4Star General Kenneth McKenzie in Aleppo Syria Help release him today!!
Please contact the local police to get General Kenneth McKenzie freed from the terrible kidnapping in Aleppo Syria held somewhere in a big forest. This is a family member in the USA in Florida and please help get him released. They are treating him very badly!! 2603:9000:B305:D778:C081:8872:BF61:6AC2 (talk) 20:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Wikipedia articles under general sanctions
- Biography articles of living people
- Active politicians
- B-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in People
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in People
- B-Class vital articles in People
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Mid-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Syria articles
- Top-importance Syria articles
- WikiProject Syria articles
- B-Class Arab world articles
- High-importance Arab world articles
- WikiProject Arab world articles
- B-Class socialism articles
- Mid-importance socialism articles
- WikiProject Socialism articles
- B-Class Terrorism articles
- Mid-importance Terrorism articles
- WikiProject Terrorism articles
- B-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press