Jump to content

Talk:Earth (The Book)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 01:58, 17 January 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Books}}, {{WikiProject Comedy}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Walmart not Carrying

[edit]

What's this about walmart and sam's club not carrying the book? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.166.209.227 (talk) 00:38, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. You should ask them. This is not a forum to discuss general questions about the book. If you find any reliable source covering this, you are welcome to tell us though. Regards SoWhy 09:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, the book can be found being sold on Walmart's online store, so I'm not sure there is any truth to the statement. FluxFuser (talk) 07:09, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quote

[edit]

On the rear cover of this book, there is a quote attributed to Wikipedia:

"EARTH (THE BOOK) is a 2010 parody humor satire book written by the authors of the popular television program The John Daly Show.

Quote

[edit]

On the rear cover of this book, there is a quote attributed to Wikipedia:

"EARTH (THE BOOK) is a 2010 parody humor satire book written by the authors of the popular television program The John Daly Show. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.116.115.121 (talk) 01:19, 25 October 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Vandalism

[edit]

I recommend that some level of block be placed on the article so that only established users can edit the page and we won't have to deal with the people that write the false quote on the article. I put up a message on the article last month, but people to that and I feel that stronger precautions should be taken. Loopygrumpkins (talk) 22:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

People who aren't Wikipedia editors won't give a f*** about the existence of this quote. It doesn't belong in the article. --CAVincent (talk) 05:27, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]