Talk:New Jersey Route 7

New Jersey Route 7 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 19, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: State highways / New Jersey Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

U.S. state highways

Locations

New Jersey

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	This article was the selected article of the New Jersey task force in February 2012.

New Jersey Mid‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

USRD GA audit

This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:21, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Dough4872 (talk) 22:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Questions on this mysterious yet inconsistent route

NJ 7 is said to have two sections, stated by NJDOT's straight line diagram. Although I doubt NJDOT has updated that diagram its safe to suggest that just maybe NJ 7 has actually become one route based on what I saw while driving it and the evidence is on Google Map's Street View. Here you will find a "JCT NJ 7" shield just before NJ 7 (according to what I saw/is on google maps) turns from Rutgers Street to Wash. Ave and vise-versa. You can see the "NJ 7 S to the left" shield just above the snapple truck on Wash. Ave before the int with Rutgers Street. Here is another "NJ 7 North" shield just west of the NJ-21 interchange suggesting that NJ 7 continues past NJ-21 in contrast to all the sources in this article. But that's only the half of it, based on what I saw NJ 7 could very well end at NJ 3. NJ 3 Westbound BGS on NJ 7. NJ 7 South shield on the off-ramp from NJ-3 EB. NJ 7 S shield just north of Orange Street (Clifton/Nutley line), the terminus stated on this article. Based on my findings, NJDOT may have made this route continuous from NJ 3 to US 1-9 Truck based on the shields put up but may have forgotten to update it on the straight line diagram. My question is this, should we go with the original SLD source, or with these new findings? 71.175.193.2 (talk) 03:59, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For now, I think we should stay with the SLD as it is still the official source listing the routing of NJ 7. If there are any updates to the SLD or any other official announcements that NJ 7 has been rerouted, the article will be updated accordingly. By the way, just because a route is signed on a road does not mean it officially follows that road. For example, New Jersey Route 24 is still signed on its former routing along CR 510, CR 513, and CR 517 between Morristown and Hackettstown even though the route officially only comprises the freeway linking I-78 in Springfield with I-287 in Hanover Township. The article on NJ 24 only describes the routing on the expressway. Dough 48 72 15:28, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree that the SLD clearly shows two separate segments with a gap in mileage, I find it curious that the article refers to an "intentional discontinuity" but does not provide an explanation (or indicate that no good explanation exists). Why the heck is the southern end of the northern segment south of the northern end of the southern segment? If NJ DOT intended there to be a discontinuity in this state route bridged by a county-maintained segment, one wouldn't expect the northern segment to continue southward of Rutgers Street. Martindelaware (talk) 02:20, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on New Jersey Route 7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]