Talk:Dean Gitter

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dean Gitter article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Dean Gitter be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

POV

Seems to me we should be careful in discussing another living person. Hovea 14:34, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy

I've reinstated the word "controversial" to describe Gitter's Belleayre Resort plan. Considering the amount of local press the issue has gotten, it seems an apt characterization. I'd like to point out that using "controversial" instead of "large" does not violate article neutrality. I also think that there should be some sources cited in regards to the unfolding Belleayre plans, as I believe they have changed somewhat in the last several years. If anyone has a clearer grasp of the trajectory of this issue, I would invite them to contribute. Justinkrivers (talk) 02:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]