Talk:Jang In-hwan

A fact from Jang In-hwan appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 October 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Korean independence activist Jang In-hwan used Arthur Schopenhauer's "patriotic insanity" defense when on trial for the murder of Japan lobbyist Durham Stevens, in San Francisco in 1908?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/October.

Wikipedia

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

RfC: Categories and description

For the purpose of wider comment on this issue, I added the {{RFChist}} template.

Should he be described as a "nationalist" or "independence activist"?
Should he be in category Category:Korean assassins and Category:Criminals who committed suicide due to his murder of Durham Stevens?

I have no particular opinion on #1, and favour #2. Regards, cab (talk) 16:21, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The best way to determine #1 would be to find modern (not 1908) sources with no discernible bias, and check whether they call him "nationalist" or "independence activist". Personally I suspect the former, but it's a wait-and-see kind of thing. #2: He most certainly committed an assassination, whether some try to justify it, or even whether it was justified, doesn't make it less of an assassination. "Criminal" is a loaded word, but here it means "persons convicted of a crime" and is thus factual. <eleland/talkedits> 16:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, why not "Jang In-hwan was a Korean nationalist and independence activist"? <eleland/talkedits> 16:41, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

both have Generally the same meaning, but the word "nationalism" is too much a sensitive word to use in the 21st century. o.d.s.t. : feet first into hell (talk) 06:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism

It seems a man by the name of Jung Sung-ki over at the Korea Times liked this article so much he lifted it verbatim and had it reprinted under his own name without giving us credit as required by the GFDL:

Jung, Sung-ki (2008-03-03), "Independent Activist Jang In-hwan Honored", Korea Times, retrieved 2008-03-22 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

Please do not tag this article as {{db-copyvio}}; Wikipedia's article predates the Korea Times by four months: [1]. cab (talk) 04:35, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jang In-hwan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303165836/http://narasarang.mpva.go.kr/person_search/graveyard_search_view.asp?idx=16&name=&grave_post=&born=&pride=&content=&name_search= to http://narasarang.mpva.go.kr/person_search/graveyard_search_view.asp?idx=16&name=&grave_post=&born=&pride=&content=&name_search=

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:48, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]