Talk:2016 United States presidential election in Utah

United States: Presidential elections / Utah Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Low-importance).
	Utah portal This article is supported by WikiProject Utah (assessed as Low-importance).

Elections and Referendums Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

s

This is one of the few states where one of the two major parties might not win. But its Johnson or McMullin who have a chance, not those other two folks. The WikiEditor who keeps supressing the McMullin picture isn't really following the story. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/12/a-new-poll-shows-a-tie-in-utah-be-skeptical-be-amazed/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cranky1000 (talk • contribs) 16:41, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Will Soros company run the online voting (primary, causus) ???

Check this article out:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/03/20/soros-board-member-chairs-firm-running-online-balloting-for-tuesdays-utah-caucuses/

AstroU (talk) 17:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

@Ali Zifan and Dennis Bratland: Both of you need to discuss here instead of just reverting. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:26, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN: Hello.That is exactly what I've tried to do, but after multiple requests, there is no admin to resolve the dispute and actually judge the whole discussion. Ali 21:32, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ali Zifan: That discussion is hopelessly compromised. Start a proper RFC, don't canvass, and go from there. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN: This the whole discussion that we had before that RfC, but still no user really stepped in and didn't helped us to resolve the dispute.Ali 21:44, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ali Zifan: Again, please start a proper RFC or use WP:DRN. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:46, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another good alternative is to just accept that even though you can have a treemap on this series of articles, and those treemaps can show county-level results, you don't get total control of every treemap on every article in the series. You might not be able to treat these articles like a Pintrist board or a Flickr group where everyone gets to post their own version of the same thing. You might not get to insist that every county-level treemap be in your preferred style. You might not get to be the only editor who creates these treemaps. Everyone, including you, gets to contribute. You did that. Now another editor is taking your contribution, and changing it. There were errors in the data and the style did a poor job of illustrating the 2016 vote in Utah. I made a version of your addition, and you started an edit war by reverting my changes. You have been unable to accept the idea that your contributions can be modified by others. "You have no right to touch my work" is how you put it. You then continued that edit war by reverting three more times. Which brings us to here.

No matter what else happens, whether you start another RfC over this very small difference, you're still going to have to accept that others can touch your work. It's not yours any more after you contribute it to Wikipedia.--Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:18, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is very funny the way you portrait me. You portrait me as someone who claims to own the articles, while in reality, it is exactly opposite. Dennis, you need to accept Wikipedia is a voluntary community. Simply because you don't like something, you cannot start doing edit war and cannot do whatever you want. Instead of being an accuser, bullying users who have fewer number of edits than yours, doing edit wars, and starting disputes, help to improve the encyclopedia. Remember Wikipedia is not your own website, which means you don't own the pages, and anyone allows to edit articles (as far as they don't put wrong information). Ali 03:28, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]