Jump to content

Talk:Oxford Circus panic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 06:19, 7 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject London}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk11:11, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that 16 people were injured fleeing a non-existent terrorist attack during the Oxford Circus panic? Source: "Sixteen people were treated after they were injured fleeing the station, following reports of gunshots being fired on a Central Line platform. There was no evidence any weapons had been fired, police said. [...] Police initially treated the incident as potentially terrorism-related, before standing down." BBC News
    • ALT1:... that pop star Olly Murs falsely told 7.8 million Twitter followers that there had been a shooting inside Selfridges department store during the Oxford Circus panic? Source: "Pop singer Olly Murs, who has 7.8 million Twitter followers tweeted from Selfridges department store: “F**k everyone get out of @selfridges now gun shots!! I’m inside.”" link

Created by Smurrayinchester (talk). Self-nominated at 09:33, 8 September 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • ☑Y Article is long enough (4432 characters), new enough (created 3 September, nominated 8 September), and article is within policy
  • ☑Y Hooks are short enough, interesting, in the article, and well sourced. Either hook is fine
  • ☑Y QPQ done
  • Overall, this nomination passes, congratulations. Very interesting article, I remember this happening. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Surprisingly good article

[edit]

Before I read this article, I would have been sceptical it would be possible to write a good article on an 'event' where basically nothing really happened, that satisfies the notability guidelines, but this one proves otherwise. Good job! (Although there are perhaps a handful of other articles on similar human panics, such as Battle of Los Angeles.) Robofish (talk) 17:25, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]